Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need Positions to watch now for 2019


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Sometimes I get bored when topics remain the same on here, and although I have no financial benefit or recognition is often not in the form of an award or simple thank you, I do this as a philanthropic gesture to strangers with a common interest.  Without further ado--

Looking at veteran contracts and ages, it is reasonable to assume that the Panthers will have some very big shoes to fill in 2019.  With that in mind, it is interesting to see who might be developing this season behind these vets and monitor their progress during the season.   I am not looking past the 2018 season, but keeping an eye on the future as the season progresses.

Here are the expected needs:

  • OLB Thomas Davis  (Announced retirement at end of season--we have 12 regular season games left with TD.  Some will argue that Thompson is next man up, but if that is the case, who replaces Thompson?  I don't see our day 3 LBs becoming more than practice squad or special teamers--maybe one steps up, but I don't see a lot on the farm right now. I am not sure how deep the draft is at OLB, but I imagine we could go there early)
  • SS Mike Adams (Gaulden- the Panthers will be watching him closely and I like the player.  Keep an eye on Cox too--he has potential and could compete this year for a job.  I think we are better at S than people realize, but we can always improve.)
  • DE Julius Peppers (Retiring at end of season.  We may have a lot of DEs, but Addison at 32 in 2019, unproven Hall and Haynes, and limited Horton are not very scary.  Regardless of the development of Hall and Haynes, I see DE in the first round next season.  Obada and Cox Jr. have a shot, but we will need an elite DE)
  • NT Kevin Love (Love will be 33 in November, 2019 and his contract expires at the end of the season.  We will need a NT to rotate with Poe. I suppose we could watch Norton, if NT is what he is to be, but he was a bit underwhelming in college with a flash or two.  Fortunately, NTs are not hard to find in free agency and can be fairly cheap.
  • C Ryan Kalil (In our offense, a cerebral center is important.  I will be watching to see who is being developed as a backup C, but also as a future center.  I think there was more to bringing in a bunch of young interior linemen than throwing numbers at the wall to see if we can find a LG--I think they are looking for Kalil's 2019 replacement.  Kyle Bosch has some potential as a C--and I wonder about trying Dorian Johnson there.  Of course, Larsen, 28 in 2019, is the top option.  Hearn and Mahon are other to consider.  Is the answer on the roster? 
  • OT Matt Kalil or depth behind (if Moton goes to G, we are thin at T.  I know, if Kalil or Williams went down, Moton would be moved out like we used to do with Wharton.  However, that creates backups at 2 positions, not 1.  Kalil is going to play well this season or he will not be back. We will need a T for depth, regardless--maybe a starter.)

 

Based on the novice assessment at this time, I rank the 2019 needs accordingly:

1. DE-until Hall and the others step up, this is a priority.  Even if they do, this is a priority.

2. OLB-Losing Davis is going to be bigger than we think--sure, he is slipping physically, but his leadership and instincts are elite.

3. C- Who knows what we have on the roster, but Ryan Kalil is a smart player, which is why we play better when he is in--even when his play suffers.  

4. DT/NT- We really have nothing behind Love, and we need 4 DTs who can play at a high level.

5. OT- This need could be LG if Kalil sucks and Moton moves outside-which is a mistake in my opinion. Moton is a better G than T. Either way, we need depth or a starting LT unless Kalil's career turns around in 2018.

6. SS- I hope we can develop Gaulden and find a better player than Searcy, who will be around 31 in 2019.

 

Note: I did not include CB because I expect Jackson, Bradberry, Seymour (a man CB, not a zone CB), Cockrell, and Elder to develop in 2018.  Capt. will be gone, but we will have 2-3 players who can improve that spot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here is all our free agents for next year.

word is we're working on Daryl right now...

 

the Funchess contract will be interesting.

 

Also both CAP and Anderson are free agents...we'll need a big back if neither are resigned.

 


 

 
PLAYER (20)
POS.
AGE
FROM
TO
2018 AAV
STATUS
MARKET VALUE
Ryan Kalil C 33 CAR TBD $8,375,000 UFA -
Thomas Davis OLB 35 CAR TBD $6,750,000 UFA -
Julius Peppers DE 38 CAR TBD $5,000,000 UFA -
Mike Adams SS 37 CAR TBD $2,100,000 UFA -
C.J. Anderson RB 27 CAR TBD $1,750,000 UFA -
Devin Funchess WR 24 CAR TBD $1,380,222 UFA -
Wes Horton DE 28 CAR TBD $1,350,000 UFA -
Fozzy Whittaker RB 29 CAR TBD $1,250,000 UFA -
Colin Jones FS 30 CAR TBD $1,200,000 UFA -
Kyle Love DT 31 CAR TBD $1,130,000 UFA -
LaDarius Gunter CB 26 CAR TBD $1,000,000 UFA -
Jeremiah Sirles G 26 CAR TBD $880,000 UFA -
Amini Silatolu G 29 CAR TBD $880,000 UFA -
Ben Jacobs ILB 30 CAR TBD $857,500 UFA -
Kenjon Barner RB 29 CAR TBD $790,000 UFA -
Daryl Williams RT 25 CAR TBD $709,280 UFA Market Value
Taylor Heinicke QB 25 CAR TBD $660,000 UFA -
Zach Moore DE 27 CAR TBD $660,000 UFA -
David Mayo OLB 24 CAR TBD $611,564 UFA -
Cameron Artis-Payne

 

 

 

 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/2019/carolina-panthers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would easily rank OT as our #1 need with DE as a close second. I do not expect to see anything other than Matt Kalil once again be atrocious and if that is the case, we need a path forward at that position.

Don't sleep on OG as a dark horse position of need, as well. Moton is a completely unknown entity(should he indeed win that position) and you have to at least account for the possibility that he just isn't up to the task. I feel the same about safety. We may end up having a serious need there as well, depending on the performances of the guys we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DE will be our top need.  It was arguably our top need this year.  I want to believe that Kalil will be ok at LT.  Our second highest need will be at Safety (again), and then will come Center.  

It's going to be a real challenge filling all those needs while picking at the last spot in each round...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 1upkiller said:

With Tepper in charge, I wouldn’t be surprised if our defense switches to 3-4 defense. 

Not as long as Rivera is running the show.  Tepper isn't going to mess with what works.  

You can't just switch to a 3-4 without going through some serious growing pains.  You have to have specific types of players and the players on this defense are for a 4-3 not a 3-4.

Tepper is the owner not the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, mc52beast said:

I think it’s safe to say that with our new owner comes a much bigger pool of players to choose from... 

There's nothing to suggest that we're suddenly going to start looking at low-character guys to fill out our roster.  I think that as long as the bottom line is putting butts in seats, we're going to continue with what works, and what's worked since day one.  

46 minutes ago, 1upkiller said:

With Tepper in charge, I wouldn’t be surprised if our defense switches to 3-4 defense. 

Owners rarely get involved in decisions like this.

What is it with the idea that Tepper is coming in and making wholesale changes anyway?  As another thread brought up, the Panthers are in the top five in wins over the past five seasons.  We've got what looks like a stacked roster, and franchise players on both sides of the field.  If Tepper came in and decided to blow that up, I would really worry about him.  Fortunately, it looks like he actually knows how to manage success, which in this case is to just let it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cyberjag said:

There's nothing to suggest that we're suddenly going to start looking at low-character guys to fill out our roster.  I think that as long as the bottom line is putting butts in seats, we're going to continue with what works, and what's worked since day one.  

Owners rarely get involved in decisions like this.

What is it with the idea that Tepper is coming in and making wholesale changes anyway?  As another thread brought up, the Panthers are in the top five in wins over the past five seasons.  We've got what looks like a stacked roster, and franchise players on both sides of the field.  If Tepper came in and decided to blow that up, I would really worry about him.  Fortunately, it looks like he actually knows how to manage success, which in this case is to just let it happen.

Key word about Tepper.  Continuity

Whether you like Rivera or not.  We have some decent continuity.  Tepper isn't going to change things because he can.

I get Tepper comes from with a Steeler background.  That doesn't mean we are going to become Pittsburgh South. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I struggled with S, but if Gaulden develops as expected, Cox is better than many think--watch him during the preseason.   Maybe he is nothing bt depth, but many huddlers label developmental players before they develop.  I also think SS is a position not too difficult to find in the draft or free agency, so it is less of a priority in that regard.

I think you are going to like Moton at G. We will see.

As for Kalil, you have to be careful about an overreaction.  Most teams do not like their OTs and many first rounders have busted lately.  If he progressed last year, let's see what that means.  Regardless, we need depth there, so there is no harm in bringing in an top T to compete.

Finally, I am skeptical that Thompson can fill Davis' role.  They are different players.  Since we are going to play more nickel,  is Thomas gaining a bit of weight next offseason?

And I did not mention Cam.  There is a QB from Miss St. who has accuracy issues but is big and athletic.  I wold love to see what Norv can do with him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C: We cold probably get by with Larsen, Van Roten, or one of the many G candidates at C next year.

LB: We could probably get by at LB--even if Mayo leaves.  (The LBs we drafted are versatile, with OLB and ILB capabilities. )

DT:  Love's impact is important.  We need to find another Love.

DE:  Even if we re-sign Horton, we will need an elite DE.

OT: We need someone to challenge at LT

S: Too many question marks and not enough quality production.  Tired of saying "if"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...