Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All the pieces are lining up for a Peppers trade to New England


Fiz

Recommended Posts

OK, if I understand NFL rules properly, Pep's contract is fully guaranteed and so that $17 mil would have to fit under a potential trade partner's cap.

Look at approx. cap figures here.

Only 2 teams have the cap room for pep, right? Tampa and Green Bay.

This is what makes me think it's impossible.

Good find. And no, he can't be restructured or extended per the franchise rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that all changes if Pepp is willing to renegotiate his contract with the new team for a long term deal. The same thing we've done with him in the past to ease cap problems.

the deadline to renegotiate a contract for a franchised player passed...months ago.

this has been discussed ad nauseam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after cutting TBC, the Patriots have further cut Joey Galloway and TE Micheal Matthews

that's three roster spots, and they'll only fill two by bringing in Brandon Tate or T Levoir.

SSSSOOOMMMEEETTTTHHHHIIINNNNNNGGGGSSSS HAPPPPENNNIIIINNNNGGGGG

They also cut some other linebacker named Eric Andrews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots' moves spark speculation

Posted by Mike Florio on October 20, 2009 11:58 AM ET

So the New England Patriots have cut four players in less than 24 hours.

The moves have sparked all sorts of speculation.

The release of Tully Banta-Cain, Joey Galloway, Eric Alexander, and Michael Matthews opens up $2.87 million in nonprorated 2009 salary cap space, which in theory allows the Patriots to absorb a player with a full-season base salary of $2.87 million. (Because all players were signed through 2009 only, there's no cap acceleration arising from cutting them.)

Some are speculating that the Patriots are making a play for Chargers linebacker Shawne Merriman.

Coincidentally, his full-season base salary for 2009 is $2.972 million.

...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw that. Speculation on Merriman or Steven Jackson, both of which could make some sense for them. Belief is that they'll trade away Adalius Thomas as part of the deal.

Have to admit I'd laugh if they made all these moves only to see the trade fall through and Banta-Cain sign with the Browns :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see us trading Peppers right now, especially to a team that we are slated to play.

And salary cap things can be adjusted and tinkered with to make room for a big dollar contract in situations like this. But I still don't think we want to release Pep and I'm not sure anyone is really looking to pick him up.

Besides, Belichek likes players that can be motivated... Pep is notoriously tough to motivate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see the pats going after aaron kampman. He is a motor guy who plays his ass off and can get got for a 2nd or 3rd I bet.

Except there's that whole problem that he would be playing out of position in the 3-4, just as he is right now in Green Bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots' moves spark speculation

Posted by Mike Florio on October 20, 2009 11:58 AM ET

So the New England Patriots have cut four players in less than 24 hours.

The moves have sparked all sorts of speculation.

The release of Tully Banta-Cain, Joey Galloway, Eric Alexander, and Michael Matthews opens up $2.87 million in nonprorated 2009 salary cap space, which in theory allows the Patriots to absorb a player with a full-season base salary of $2.87 million. (Because all players were signed through 2009 only, there's no cap acceleration arising from cutting them.)

Some are speculating that the Patriots are making a play for Chargers linebacker Shawne Merriman.

Coincidentally, his full-season base salary for 2009 is $2.972 million.

And people wonder why their good. Always looking to improve. God I hate them but, ya gotta love'em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...