Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rebound season for our whipping boy??


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

I know what you are thinking - "which Whipping Boy?" - MKG, Frank, Batum, maybe Clifford or MJ??

 

I am going to prolly regret saying this on here but:
I see a huge bounce back year for Batum. This past year was arguably his worst year of his career - especially when you factor in the expectations for him Vs the rest of his career. I really thought Dwight and Batum would be a Dream combo with Kemba running around having fun. Unfortunately is was a Nightmare. They didn't mesh well together and I still think Batum has been playing out of position at the SG position.

If Borrego wants to run and gun, Batum could be a key benefactor from his system. If Borrego is smart - I think they slide him back to SF and MKG to the bench. Lamb would be the starting SG - good size to balance the height issue with Kemba. A starting lineup of Kemba-Lamb-Batum-Marvin-Zeller ain't that terrible. You really have 4 shooters who all defend their positions at an above-average level. I see a lot of potential assists with that lineup.

Batum's career numbers:
1784933016_ScreenShot2018-06-30at8_53_38PM.thumb.png.e8ecf3799225c622c3b3096baf6bcbfa.png

 

I know his contract is terrible - just sickening.. but I would bet my money that last year was the exception, not the rule when it comes to Batum.
If you take Dwight's average numbers (16.5pts, 12reb @ game) and redistribute a portion of those to the rest of the team = I can easily see a 15pt- 6reb- 6ast season from Batum.. AND If he really bounces back, 17pt- 6.5reb- 6.5ast.
Anybody what to come out in this limb with me??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

I know what you are thinking - "which Whipping Boy?" - MKG, Frank, Batum, maybe Clifford or MJ??

 

I am going to prolly regret saying this on here but:
I see a huge bounce back year for Batum. This past year was arguably his worst year of his career - especially when you factor in the expectations for him Vs the rest of his career. I really thought Dwight and Batum would be a Dream combo with Kemba running around having fun. Unfortunately is was a Nightmare. They didn't mesh well together and I still think Batum has been playing out of position at the SG position.

If Borrego wants to run and gun, Batum could be a key benefactor from his system. If Borrego is smart - I think they slide him back to SF and MKG to the bench. Lamb would be the starting SG - good size to balance the height issue with Kemba. A starting lineup of Kemba-Lamb-Batum-Marvin-Zeller ain't that terrible. You really have 4 shooters who all defend their positions at an above-average level. I see a lot of potential assists with that lineup.

Batum's career numbers:
1784933016_ScreenShot2018-06-30at8_53_38PM.thumb.png.e8ecf3799225c622c3b3096baf6bcbfa.png

 

I know his contract is terrible - just sickening.. but I would bet my money that last year was the exception, not the rule when it comes to Batum.
If you take Dwight's average numbers (16.5pts, 12reb @ game) and redistribute a portion of those to the rest of the team = I can easily see a 15pt- 6reb- 6ast season from Batum.. AND If he really bounces back, 17pt- 6.5reb- 6.5ast.
Anybody what to come out in this limb with me??

I actually want to see Batum play a lot with Monk. I think Monk's game can improve greatly improve with Batum beside him. Actually that is my ideal lineup but I know we couldn't pay Nic that much money to be a backup. Batum would be perfect with our young reserves to give them direction. 

Starters: Kemba, Lamb, Bridges, Williams, Cody

Reserves: FA, Monk, Batum, Frank, Hernangomez

* Can't see a place for MKG. Going from starter to who knows where he 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Yeah MKG needs to be traded. Maybe package him with Bacon for a backup PG? I wonder what his trade value for that package would be if we just put the feelers out.

That package would get nothing special. MKG has basically a 2nd round pick value especially with his contract. And Bacon was just a 2nd round pick. 2 second round picks net you no good backup PG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

We just need a coach who can motivate properly. I think at this point Lamb should be playing over either Batum or MKG.

Kemba-Monk-Lamb-Frank-Cody would be an interesting lineup.

Yeah I lost total faith in Clifford, well what was left, when Lamb wasn't getting the most minutes over those guys last year.   Then not playing Monk and seeing him at the end?    Get out of here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Yeah I lost total faith in Clifford, well what was left, when Lamb wasn't getting the most minutes over those guys last year.   Then not playing Monk and seeing him at the end?    Get out of here.

I might be wrong but I though Lamb was leading the bench and playing clutch minutes down the stretch. Lamb had 24.6 mins a game and MKG only had 25 mins as the starting SF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

I might be wrong but I though Lamb was leading the bench and playing clutch minutes down the stretch. Lamb had 24.6 mins a game and MKG only had 25 mins as the starting SF.

That seems right but I think a lot of those MKG/Batum minutes should have been Lamb's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have any faith in Batum.. He showed his heart last year and it wasn't pretty.. He has the same affliction as Diaw .. No dog or aggression in their games and you should never count on either one to be more than a role player.. 

I'm tired of ppl and the Basis Charlotte Media (Bonnell) blaming Dwight for Batum stealing money.. 

Dwight had nothing to do with Batum worthless defense or him being fat and out of shape. 

Dwight had nothing to do with Batum passive offense and complete lack of aggression or taken charge of a game..

Batum is being paid to at least avg. 18 to 20 points a game and barely gave us double digits.  

He was soft and never attacked the rim.. He never took advantage of always having a smaller defender on him.. Many teams started putting PGs on him while letting their better defender and taller SG affect Kemba .. If I see that screen quick off blanche 3 point shot (praying for a foul) or that fade away post shot (when being guarded by a 6'4 and below player) from him.. I'm going to throw something on the court.. Dude rates as one of the biggest blunder moves in team history.. And this is the team who drafted Adam Morrison.. 

I hope the new coaches are not as attached as Clifford was to given him minutes and will play the younger better players when he sucks again this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...