Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Anderson’s Value.


Black&BlueBubba

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

Sit Armah and have both on the field. I'd rather use 2 RB sets since we have CJ rather than a FB and RB

^^This. Armah will get snaps, but teams aren't afraid of him breaking one off. With CMC and CJ, both can run power, sweeps, flairs, screens, and most of all, take it to the house. Can't sleep on either with both in the backfield. Depending on how Thomas progresses, we could run a power running game and have 5 receiver routes and everything in between with a 2 TE set with CJ and CMC in the backfield. Norv is licking his chops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pantha-kun said:

Maybe the coaches are more curious as to how cmc does with a full load? Looking back to last season with the exception of one drive in the GB game and for part of the first ATL game,  McCafrey was constantly in and out of the lineup and only got over 10 carries in 3 games iirc.  

I dont think theyre going to be using cj like stew last year. Maybe theryre going to try cmc as the everydown back and use cj for specialized situations like long pass pro and short yardage,  goal line.  

I think it would be unwise to do that. Both have receiving skill sets. I think both will be used when they are most effective unlike we did last year. To explain more some games you will need power and others quickness  but both can catch so you can send them out on pass plays as well  depending on the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This clip just helped remind me that with an actual offensive coordinator like Norv, he  can use Anderson in a variety of ways. A guy like CJ would have been useful in the SB chipping against Von Miller. Instead we gave Remmers no help.   Norv could run a 2TE set with Anderson in the backfield.  That’s a lot of quality blocking while still having Olsen and 2 receivers out in routes. Having Ian Thomas and Anderson providing quality OL help so Cam can go deep on occasion without getting killed like he would have under Shula. Makes me feel like a guy like Norv has some tools to help out our OL with different schemes.  Very refreshing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...