Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preseason Game 4 - Who made the team?


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Hood didn’t play so I think he made it... so CAP or Barner if we keep 4?

Barner returned better than Byrd so I would say Barner stays over Byrd if we have to choose between a 4th running back or 6th receiver,.. 

Kyle Allen made a case for number 2, he looked poised and on point for the last half of the game... the other two SUCK,..they suck....

not sure about the rest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Noticed Keyvon Seymour didn't play tonight - not sure if that's good or bad news for him

Also didn't play against Pats. I don't see how he can make the team. If Rivera keeps him as one of "his guys", it's a slap in the face to everyone else that has fought tooth and nail to try to make the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

Noticed Keyvon Seymour didn't play tonight - not sure if that's good or bad news for him

Believe Rivera made a statement this week that insinuated he was safe in terms of making the team... not something to get excited about, but he probably is still one of the best CB's on the team unfortunately.

The DB group reminds me of the WR group in 2014.  A solid rookie with a lot of potential in Jackson, and a collection of other guys.  Except maybe Bradberry, who I think can bounce back.

Certainly not a group that inspires a lot of confidence.  Hopefully our Front 7 can mitigate some of their deficiencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seltzer said:

Believe Rivera made a statement this week that insinuated he was safe in terms of making the team... not something to get excited about, but he probably is still one of the best CB's on the team unfortunately.

The DB group reminds me of the WR group in 2014.  A solid rookie with a lot of potential in Jackson, and a collection of other guys.  Except maybe Bradberry, who I think can bounce back.

Certainly not a group that inspires a lot of confidence.  Hopefully our Front 7 can mitigate some of their deficiencies.

Doss has looked like one of the better CBs this whole preseason and should make it over Seymour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

on 53

- Damiere Byrd 

- Andre Smith

- Bryan Cox jr

CUT

- Blaine Clausell

- Daeshon Hall

- Chris Manhertz to IR  - we go with 2 TE's

I'm excited about the potential of Smith and Cox, and Byrd has proven his worth as a returner and as a WR

Clausell is garbage, although I think he has a shot to make the initial 53 and maybe even last a few weeks b/c of depth and injuries.

Hall has been a disappointment, although I hope we could stash him on PS and develop him.  

I can see no reason to keep Manhertz when Armah is a superior blocking and Thomas has infinite more potential

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillerKat said:

Doss has looked like one of the better CBs this whole preseason and should make it over Seymour.

Doss got caught up in a numbers crunch on a loaded Denver secondary and then cut to make a point, but yeah I think he has more potential than Seymour.  Seymour has seemed to regress most of time here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This final game has shown me we should only carry 5 CBs in Bradberry, Jackson, Captain, Elder and Doss so that we can carry an 11th lineman. It'll actually be 10, but Williams will count for 24 hours until we are allowed to put him on IR if we plan on bringing him back this season. 

LT: Matt Kalil - Blaine Clausell
LG: Greg Van Roten - (Brendan Mahon)
C: Ryan Kalil - Tyler Larsen
RG: Trai Turner - #Jeremiah Sirles# 
RT: Taylor Moton - #Adam Bisnowaty# - +Darryl Williams+

* = Draft Pick
# = Free Agent
() = Undrafted Free Agent
+ = IR Designated to Return

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Hood didn’t play so I think he made it... so CAP or Barner if we keep 4?

Barner returned better than Byrd so I would say Barner stays over Byrd if we have to choose between a 4th running back or 6th receiver,.. 

Kyle Allen made a case for number 2, he looked poised and on point for the last half of the game... the other two SUCK,..they suck....

not sure about the rest.

 

such awful takes lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...