Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Analytics- way of the future


Reebis21

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, billionairemonk said:

it works in baseball because baseball is an individual sport disguised as a team sport.  there are too many variables in team sports to make analytics as valuable as it is in baseball.

U ever play baseball? This post couldn’t be more wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

U ever play baseball? This post couldn’t be more wrong 

I did for most of my life, and it is correct.  just because there are other guys on the field at the same time as you doesn't qualify baseball as a team sport. 

read the last post on this link:  http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actuarial_discussion_forum/archive/index.php/t-237635.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, t96 said:

Analytics are very important, there's a reason Belichick has been using them for decades now. But like he does, you can't let analytics replace coaching, personal analysis and eye tests, they are just one tool to aid in building a successful team.

eye tests are part of analytics 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, wud35 said:

I totally agree with you just wish you hadn't used Belichick as an example. lol he also uses other techniques I don't agree with.  

Yeah, I watched a debate segment Monday where they routinely referenced Mangini calling and begging Bill not to tape him like he knew he did to others before blowing the whistle on the whole deal.  Think about it, if that hadn't happened we never would have known.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, billionairemonk said:

I did for most of my life, and it is correct.  just because there are other guys on the field at the same time as you doesn't qualify baseball as a team sport. 

read the last post on this link:  http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actuarial_discussion_forum/archive/index.php/t-237635.html

U sure u weren’t playing cricket? There is always an individual aspect to every team game. If u don’t think baseball is a team sport I’m not going to waste ANY time arguing with you and will probably block you so that I don’t have to be dumbed down to anything you say. Thanks! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Analytics are very important, there's a reason Belichick has been using them for decades now. But like he does, you can't let analytics replace coaching, personal analysis and eye tests, they are just one tool to aid in building a successful team.

Seattle, Cleveland, ATL, and the Rams all use analytics in team building and game planning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given Tepper's background in hedge funds, it makes perfect sense that he would be familiar with and be a proponent of the use of analytics. Undoubtably, he has used and continues to use analytics in his " other job". His success speaks to the value of analytical tools.

For years now many mathematics majors head into the world of finance. The smart teams have been using customizing and using these tools for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...