Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McDermmot Special - Double A Gap Blitz


CPcavedweller

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's a staple of the zone blitz but other schemes sometimes use it too.

Are we even running a zone blitz scheme anymore? Seems like we don't really blitz much this year or I could just be use to Wilks system where we blitzed almost every down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we'll see more of it when TD comes back? The thing about having both LBs (we almost always run this look out of a nickel formation) right up on the LOS giving the look of a blitz is that it requires studs at LB. You gotta have a guy who can both threaten as a blitzer as well as have the ability of giving the impression that he's coming while at the same time being able to drop back into coverage if that's what the call or read determines. Not just any team can pull off this look routinely with a high level of effectiveness. Having two LBs like Luke and TD is what allowed us to give that look so often. You don't see it nearly that often from other teams around the league. They don't have Luke and TD. Right now, we don't either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Snake said:

Are we even running a zone blitz scheme anymore? Seems like we don't really blitz much this year or I could just be use to Wilks system where we blitzed almost every down. 

I figure we are, but I won't claim to have done a lot of schematic analysis of the defense over the last couple of weeks. Could be worth taking a look at it since we're not really doing all that well this year.

Regardless, running a Zone Blitz scheme doesn't necessarily mean you blitz all the time, especially if you run it out of a 4-3 like we do. It's still ideal to try and get pressure with four rushers if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I figure we are, but I won't claim to have done a lot of schematic analysis of the defense over the last couple of weeks. Could be worth taking a look at it since we're not really doing all that well this year.

Regardless, running a Zone Blitz scheme doesn't necessarily mean you blitz all the time, especially if you run it out of a 4-3 like we do. It's still ideal to try and get pressure with four rushers if you can.

It seems to me we have run more man this year and used stunts. Could just be a sign of better pressure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

Zone blitz is a tactic we have employed but never been our scheme. At least not since Capers.

We've never done it so much as to call it our scheme.

Zone blitz is a scheme, not a play.

It's the same scheme the Steelers use. More importantly it was the scheme employed by Jim Johnson, Ron Rivera's primary defensive mentor when he started coaching. Johnson also mentored Sean McDermott.

The Double A Gap blitz is a staple of it, and one that we ran pretty frequently under both McDermott and Steve Wilks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Which is why I'm all for trading Lamelo. Guy misses half of every season. I swear he just likes to sit on the bench to show off his street clothes. I think it negatively impacts the other guys who do the same. If guys don't want to play, they don't need to be here. Coach and gm need to get stricter
    • See, I have a different view of it. I think that just the opposite is very true, and often proven on our very own team.  Look at the impact that CMC had when he was here.  Look at how bring in two top rate IOL to play guard last season made a huge difference in finally getting a stable front for Bryce to live behind. It took a while for it to bear fruit, but those last games were just relevatory. And off ball linebackers like Luke Kuechly, not just running a defense but dictating the game when he's on the field, truly remarkable what a difference that makes. Personally, he had as much or maybe even more to do with that Super Bowl appearance as Cam did.  What I see in the NFL is teams trying hard to cover up for a lack of good linebackers by stacking the D-line. But it gives them a crust defense, one that is hard and crunchy on the outside but a feast within. Linebackers shouldn't just rule the middle of the field, but should be directing traffic and working as enforcers.  But hey, whatever. "Devalued" positions often come back to bite you in the ass when they are neglected. Ask anyone who has had to clean up the mess left behind by a former college coach who took over a pro team and brought their college recruiting mindset in. Yanno, like Matt Rhule did.   
    • I see it this way--XL was raw.  Raw players when drafted who are forced to start immediately are very raw players in the NFL-- How is he helped? TMac will shift the focus of the defense away from XL.  XL will be more experienced.  He will have an offseason of jugs work.  He is a very good athlete.  He can only get better.  Wallace?  Same thing.  He will get better with an improved defensive front and the addition of these heat-seeking head hunters at S.  I think about the players we will have on defense in 2025 that we did not have in 2024. Derrick Brown. DE Brown III NT Wharton DE Jones Edge Moehrig S Princely. Edge Scourton. Edge Ransom. S Cam Jackson NT Roseboom  LB While we may not know what we have, we know what we don't have--  
×
×
  • Create New...