Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid Press Conference


Saca312

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Cat said:

I like this guy already and he already taught me something i didn't know. I was unaware that black people were excluded from social security for 20 years, I guess I'm not surprised it just never really thought about it. 

It's actually debatable if they really were purposely excluded.  

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/03/a-second-look-at-social-securitys-racist-origins/?utm_term=.c02abdf5d43a

Quote

DeWitt then sifts through the congressional record and finds — in contrast to other historians — that the Southern Democrats on the relevant committees didn't seem to have much of an opinion about excluding farmworkers and maids. "At no point," DeWitt writes, "did Southern Democrats create the exclusion or push it through Congress." The real push came from Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr., who argued that the program would be an administrative nightmare for the IRS if everyone was covered, at least at first.

Now, Katznelson still makes a detailed case that a large number of other New Deal programs in the 1930s were purposefully altered by Southern Democrats so that they both "brought much needed funding to their poverty-stricken region while protecting the character of [the South's] racial arrangements." But with Social Security, at least, there's a strong counterargument that this wasn't ever the explicit aim.

And Morgenthau was actually a civil rights supporter, so it would be hard to ascribe racist motives to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Purposely or not if they didn't get the benefits during and after the great depressions that's something that can really set families/people back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sub Zero said:

Yeah he had class while he stood with Ali and beat up women.. 

I'm behind you 100% in your advocacy of literacy.

But pray tell -- what is this stfu you mention so often in your posts?  It must pertain to your persistence about others' reading habits, or maybe about your favoring free speech.

Is it an acronym for "so true, fine unbeliever"? Or is it "still teaching full understanding"?  (surely not "stop trying female undergarments")

Enhance the quality of the discussion, even more than you have, and enlighten us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

No Cam talking about being a black QB before the Superbowl (but not being able to fully speak on it intelligently) was a downer.. Than backing off it with the coon dance was horrible.. Atleast Reid knows what he talking about knows how to Express it intelligently and won't let you and others shut him down is admirable.. And more like Ali than Cam was...

 

What did Cam say? Did he say Panthers fan didn't want a black qb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jamos14 said:

What did I miss?!!

others that have a faster connection can fill  you in, I just flagged him as spammer as soon as I read it.

personal attacks and despicable comments will get that result for everyone in this thread.  Say your piece and be nice for the next hour or so (that's when I clock out)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last several years have been especially illuminating for me as a white man. I don't feel guilty for being a white male; it's something out of my control. However I can see the privileges I've had, and how, even if it comes from a sincere place, that telling women and minorities how I think they should handle their fights for equal rights/treatment will rarely be received in the way I intend it. It's tough to be relegated to a supporting role when you've been taught your entire life that you're supposed to lead from the front, but what I think they are looking for is for those of us who support them to truly support them. To have them tell us what their play is and let them know we've got their back. I support what Eric Reid is fighting for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Floppin said:

I dont understand the distraction angle. Does a coworker expressing social justice opinions at work suddenly make you perform badly at your job? Like if Jim Bob at Wal-Mart hears something he doesn't like from Carol-the-cashier he suddenly starts stocking things on completely wrong shelves?

I don't think so, Gano is a Trump supporter and doesn't like the protest and everyone deals with him. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

 what happens when Reid blames came for a loss or not supporting his cause? Or calls Olson or Kalil a racist. That's when it will become bad. 

Dude?  

You misspelled 2 of the 3 players names.

 

And why would he ever blame Cam publicly for a loss?

Or call Olsen or Kalil a racist?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...