Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

okay ron rivera's backup plan if it was 4th and 1 was to have Cam QB sneak the ball

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Chaos Veteran

Chaos

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, bobsfoodbasics said:

He's so lost.

I see why the players are so terrible during crunch time. Their "leader" is a buffoon when it comes to game management.

 

Careful saying these things.  I mean we’re 3-1 so apparently there can be no flaws.  Especially coaching flaws.

 

C0A91300-575E-49CA-BC23-31721DC7B31F.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted

It would have been difficult to get the field goal unit out there in 28 seconds and lined up without having to rush Gano.

From 63 yards I don’t think you really want to have to rush your kicker so I can see the point, sneak to get the first then clock (theoretically there is time as long as Cam doesn’t break one off for like 15 yards).

Regardless, that last minute was a poo show and Chase should have told Rivera (or Rivera should have known) Gano’s range well before that play. The man is out there trying to get extra yards when we didn’t need it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, bobsfoodbasics said:

Can't even blame norv this time.

I think this clip also shows why Cam is getting the plays in so late. He's got to wait for Ron to have a say before the play is relayed to him by Scott Turner.

Don’t think that is it, Cam could even be seen blaming the headset this week.

If the play truly has to go from Norv to Ron to Scott then everyone needs to go because that is some pee wee $#*!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, bobsfoodbasics said:

Can't even blame norv this time.

I think this clip also shows why Cam is getting the plays in so late. He's got to wait for Ron to have a say before the play is relayed to him by Scott Turner.

It became obvious that it was Ron doing a lot of this dumb sh!t the moment a lot of the same conservative bullsh!t carried over from Shula to Norv

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, bobsfoodbasics said:

How about saving some time outs for crunch time ron? 

Idiot.

Only had 1 timeout left for that final drive in Atlanta that ended up us needing a Hail Mary. If this idiot could learn how to manage a clock maybe that game goes to overtime 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...