Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We had the slowest paced offense in 2017, currently tied for 4th slowest this season


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

The Colts have the fastest pace. How's that working for them? The Saints, at 4-1 and with the most points in the league, are only .44 sec and 3 positions ahead of us. I would submit that in the world of significant stats, this one is near the bottom of the barrel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably have the slowest pace by season end

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/07/16/panthers-offense-played-at-slowest-pace-in-the-nfl-last-season/

 

It’s sad knowing Cam and this offense will never reach their full potential under this regime.

This is a faulty stat, you slow the offense to give the defense rest, the defense is currently and obviously been struggling lately. So big suprise the offense slows it’s pace of play.

NOTE.

After further review!!! this is a garbage stat. And means nothing. Panthers average .56 seconds slower per play pace than the New Orleans Saints.

stat means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So infuriating.  It'd be one thing if there were a tangible benefit and the defense were actually playing well and the rest helped them.  This defense sucks, so why not speed up the offense, keep the opposing defense on their heels, and go for the jugular?  You win football games by scoring points.  Period.  Defense is a good thing, but in the end, you've gotta score.  We are the least aggressive offense in the NFL by a very large margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

So infuriating.  It'd be one thing if there were a tangible benefit and the defense were actually playing well and the rest helped them.  This defense sucks, so why not speed up the offense, keep the opposing defense on their heels, and go for the jugular?  You win football games by scoring points.  Period.  

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

We will probably have the slowest pace by season end

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/07/16/panthers-offense-played-at-slowest-pace-in-the-nfl-last-season/

 

It’s sad knowing Cam and this offense will never reach their full potential under this regime.

Yet we are 3-1. 

I didn't bother to click the link. It's pointless. 

I don't want a fast paced offense, unless we have to score. 

You don't control a game with a face paced offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

Hence me using the term "defense is a good thing", which you conveniently didn't mark bold.

You're utterly delusional if you think that running the ball and playing defense in today's NFL is a winning formula.  The I-formation don't work like it used to buddy.  Defenses can stop that in their sleep - then they send they're 5 receiver sets out and massacre you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Yet we are 3-1. 

I didn't bother to click the link. It's pointless. 

I don't want a fast passed offense, unless we have to score. 

You don't control a game with a face paced offense. 

Disagree.  You absolutely can control a game with a fast paced offense.  Especially in the league today.  You put much more pressure on the opposing offense when they know they have to score to keep up.  

 

It's a tried and true formula that works AGAINST the Panthers very often.  If you get a lead on us, we're not coming back from it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, London Loves Luke said:

Lol, this is exactly what's wrong with everyone complaining about this stat. You don't "win football games by scoring points.  Period." You win football games by scoring more points than your opponents. If that means limiting how much time your opponent has to score points, it means you have a better chance of winning. 

So many fans have no concept of basic football principles. 

You beat good teams with great offenses, by keeping their offense on the sideline. How do you do that?? With time eating, long drives that score points. 

The best defense, is an offense that can sustain drives, while putting points on the scoreboard. It's what you want, especially if the defense is struggling. Even if the defense was elite, you'd want to do the same thing, to maximize winning. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Disagree.  You absolutely can control a game with a fast paced offense.  Especially in the league today.  You put much more pressure on the opposing offense when they know they have to score to keep up.  

 

It's a tried and true formula that works AGAINST the Panthers very often.  If you get a lead on us, we're not coming back from it. 

Don't you wish anything in this post was true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Personally I think he's a nightmare to cover I think linebackers generally aren't fast enough to keep up with him in coverage and cornerbacks don't have the strength to tackle him one-on-one in physically bring them down which would normally lead to a broken tackle or a nasty stiff arm or just bully ball play sure you could find a receiver with comparable speed like Cooper but he's faster than Cooper sure you can find a wide receiver that is the same size but he's probably More powerful than them and a better blocker.  The size speed athleticism package that he is in is completely unique it's easier to say I'd rather have just a big blocker because we've never seen this type of profile before I'm a risk taker I think you would be God blessed if this was there at 19 I think if you can get a guy that's a tight end who immediately becomes the fastest guy on your offense and at the same time that third wide receiver that can stretch and burn defenses over the top that's the perfect what the Panthers need type weapon.
    • I think you're under selling Sadiq. They are two different players in terms of how they win. Loveland is 2 inches taller maybe 5-6 pounds heavier. Comparing his speed to sadiq.. well your comparing a 4.7 guy to a 4.3 guy I'm seeing a guy that can take a bubble screen from the tight end position and turn it into a house call. I'm not saying the guy is a certified home run pick but I don't think there's really a president's for a comparison for this kind of athlete. It's easy to say this doesn't look like Warren or Loveland because we haven't seen guys that fit this profile The closest you might be able to get is Vernon Davis.  He's not as sure far as those guys were but at 19 I think almost everybody is going to have some warts and he's a lottery ticket of could be top 10 in the draft player or could fail I am more of a risk taker I think he fits the athletic profile that could be a homerun, like I said he's almost 40 lb bigger than Cooper and like 4-5 in taller than Cooper so and he's faster. So whatever you think Cooper gives you I think he does that and more. If you want to go with one of the office alignment I can understand that as well but for value as a receiving threat I don't think there's a bigger value at number 19.
    • I’ve haven’t seen anything that says we have interest in Njoku?
×
×
  • Create New...