Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rewatching the final sequence


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

After Newton gained the first down on 3rd and 1, I felt pretty optimistic that we were gonna score.

Ugh.

Now I'm seeing a lot of arguing over the final sequence, so I decided to go back and review it. 

Here's what I saw:

FIRST DOWN: Quick basic crosser to McCaffrey 

Good play choice, good execution, Panthers call a time out. We're at the 16 with 47 seconds left...plenty of time and the team isn't rushing.  I know Rivera isn't known for good clock management, but we were in a good place here. 

SECOND DOWN: Incomplete to McCaffrey in the end zone 

McCaffrey was the right choice on the play. He was being covered by a safety (Montae Nicholson), had a step on his man and no one else was all that open, but Chris Clark allows heavy pressure on Newton by Preston Smith.  The pressure forces Newton to get rid of the ball before he's fully ready and the throw winds up sailing.

Clark looked slow and off balance coming out of his stance, so much so I rewound it a couple of times to see if he tripped over Van Roten's feet or something.  Saw no evidence that he did.  It was just a poor effort that came at a really bad time. If Clark anchors his block, that play is probably a touchdown. Aside from Clark, the rest of the offensive line actually did all right on this play.  But as the saying goes, it only takes one.

It's bad enough to get beaten.  It's even worse to look really awkward doing it.  If you go back and look at Clark on that play, you'll probably see what I'm talking about.  His body language after coming out of his stance looks less like a football block and more like an awkward sideways dance step. Clark's failure to do much else other than barely stand in Preston Smith's way probably cost us a score there.

THIRD DOWN: Incomplete to Funchess in the end zone

First off, I don't think it's coincidental that they went after the same area as the previous play.  Either Norv Turner, Cam Newton or maybe both (my guess) probably figured that the prior play should have been a score so they wanted to attack the same area again, this time with Funchess rather than McCaffrey.  I agree with that decision. Redskins might have seen it too.  Coverage this play was by Quinton Dunbar rather than the safety Nicholson, but Nicholson was shading in that direction just in case Dunbar needed help.  That's a reasonable choice since Dunbar had been getting picked on all game. 

There's pressure again, this time from all sides.  Newton's pocket is barely bigger than a broom closet, but the pressure wasn't enough that I think Newton needed to rush the throw.  And to be clear, I don't believe he did. His body language didn't look it. Sadly, rushed or not, it was a poorly thrown pass. It ended up landing far enough out of bounds that it would have taken a phenomenal effort by Funchess to haul it in. Regardless of that though, it's the decision, not the pass itself, that is most deserving of scrutiny here.

The announcers - and pretty much everyone here - made note that Greg Olsen was at the first down marker and had a step on D J Swearinger.  I'd have to agree throwing it to Olsen there would have been a better decision. You could also have gone to McCaffrey in the left flat though, and possibly with even greater potential results.  McCaffrey was being covered by Josh Harvey-Clemons, a linebacker. Seriously, a linebacker, and a linebacker that was playing about five or six yards off at that.  I'll take that matchup ten times out of ten and bet on McCaffrey to at the very least get the first down, and probably score.  Heck, even Jarius Wright was in a good spot on the right side inside the five.  With a nice sideline throw, that's also at least a first down and maybe even a touchdown.

But because of what I noted above, I think it was already decided that pass was headed for the end zone no matter who else was open (for the record, Funchess wasn't) before the ball was even snapped.  And while I agree with the decision to attack where the defense is looking vulnerable, you still have to make the right decision.  Even if you know you have a favorable matchup, you have to walk the steps.  Newton didn't, and probably heard about it from Olsen shortly thereafter.

FOURTH DOWN: Incomplete to Jarius Wright

This one hurt.  I felt reasonably sure that even if we didn't score on this play, we'd at least get the first and have a new set of downs with thirty some seconds left. 

Alas, it was not to be. 

Wright seemed to be trying to lobby the officials for an illegal contact or a defensive holding call, but he didn't get the call.  I'm not sure it matters.  This ball didn't look like it was all that well thrown anyway.  While there was heavy pressure from all sides, with Preston Smith abusing Chris Clark with a speed rush again, Newton isn't falling back and he didn't throw off his back foot.  The ball just goes too high and too far. You could make an argument that even though he got set and made the throw, Newton did have pressure in his face. And if Wright's complaint was correct (I didn't see it, but it's possible) then who knows?

So overall result: One good play, one pressure, one good idea ruined by a poor choice and one possible bad pass / possible missed penalty.

Whose fault is it?  Everybody's. If any one of several sequences goes differently before this point, we might not have been in this spot. 

Teams win. Teams lose.

Speaking of which, let's not discount the Redskins defense here.  Sometimes you can do everything right but the other team just does what they do a little better. Ironically enough, the flow of this game followed a similar path to a lot of our games in the most recent Super Bowl season.  The Redskins went up big early then let us back in the game and needed to pull a last minute win out of their ass.  Goodness knows we did that plenty back in 2015. Still, as infuriating as that often was, it sure felt a lot better being on the other side of it.

I know a lot of people will blame Newton, and it'd be insane to think he didn't play a role.  Even so, there's plenty of blame to go around.  And let's be fair, even great quarterbacks have bad sequences.  I remember watching Donovan McNabb have a horrible four down sequence to close out a playoff loss some years back.  There's also Tom Brady's horrible series against the Eagles late in the Super Bowl.  It happens.  All you can do is pick up and move on to next week.

My take.  Make of it what you will (a hat...a broach...a pterodactyl...etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fright said:

The bad sequences seem to be far too often with Cam tho. That’s what happens when your QB is jacked like a RB, through. Always inconsistent with accuracy.

Can't put that whole sequence on Newton though, especially not the second down play.  Chris Clark owes him an apology for that one.

But ya know, what's really gonna bake your noodle later on is...would Matt Kalil have done a better job?

oracle.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Can't put that whole sequence on Newton though, especially not the second down play.  Chris Clark owes him an apology for that one.

But ya know, what's really gonna bake your noodle later on is...would Matt Kalil have done a better job on that play?

oracle.jpg

 

Oh lord, don’t make me choke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Can't put that whole sequence on Newton though, especially not the second down play.  Chris Clark owes him an apology for that one.

But ya know, what's really gonna bake your noodle later on is...would Matt Kalil have done a better job on that play?

oracle.jpg

 

If Kalil is there Newton doesn’t even get the ball off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panther4life said:

2nd and 5,  Torrey Smith was open on right sideline for at least a 3-4 gain plus room to run for more. 

Torrey Smith showed up to the ball game,.. owned a series to himself,.. was open for a 1st down and we ignored him,.. in weeks past that would have been acceptable-- but today-- not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Game was lost when Rivera punted on 4th and inches from the 50.

Yep we had to go for that. And I think it was Moore who couldn't down it in the 5 and it was a touchback... bad bad play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...