Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints use Hill just like we use Cam


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Saints kicking ass again and as I watch, they use Hill just like we use Cam. Of course he can't pass like Cam, but Hill, Ingram, and Kamara on the field ....makes it very hard to defend.

If they start using this guy to pass a little also, could be a bit or our own medicine when we play. Just a quick observation on this slow Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lemory said:

What an insult to Cam

Nah...Cam's got a laser beam arm. Funny that Peyton see's what Cam can can do to an offense and trying to find someway to incorporate in his offense. Actually a compliment to Cam. Only one Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. If you just take away Cam's arm strength, ability to read a defense, passing ability, rushing ability, strength, leadership, passion, emotion, making inferior players around him better, charisma, drive, determination and all-around NFL MVP skill level of play, then him and Hill are in fact very similar players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BananaGrabber said:

Agreed. If you just take away Cam's arm strength, ability to read a defense, passing ability, rushing ability, strength, leadership, passion, emotion, making inferior players around him better, charisma, drive, determination and all-around NFL MVP skill level of play, then him and Hill are in fact very similar players. 

I never said they are similar players as far as ability. Point I was trying to make is that Peyton trying to use Hill in a way that we use Cam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...