Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Paging Simon Cowell...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

There's been lots of speculation that 2018 is an "audition" season for Ron Rivera and Marty Hurney, essentially their chance to prove to new owner David Tepper that they can be trusted to run the franchise from here on out.

Objectively speaking, we don't know if that's actually true.

But if that is the case, then how would you say the "auditions" are going so far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know the question is phrased to look at each one separately, but I'm kind of treating them as a package right now.

I think they stay or they go together.

I don't.  

But as far as overall performance, Hurney drafted well, did ok with free agent signings (because of limited cap space) and didn't put us in cap hell.  Just based on job performance alone, he could likely stay.  Whereas Rivera and company will be more dependent on how we finish the season.    

 

Of course, the reality is that it also depends on the relationship between Hurney and Tepper, and that is something we know almost nothing about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't.  

But as far as overall performance, Hurney drafted well, did ok with free agent signings (because of limited cap space) and didn't put us in cap hell.  Just based on job performance alone, he could likely stay.  Whereas Rivera and company will be more dependent on how we finish the season.    

Of course, the reality is that it also depends on the relationship between Hurney and Tepper, and that is something we know almost nothing about.

Hurney looked like a good GM his first few seasons last time too.

I can deal with "interim Marty" but I've seen just how bad "long term Marty" can be.

With our team set up to have a major personnel overhaul next offseason, I don't want any part of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...