Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5-13 in the NFC South from 2016-18


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Seoul_Panther said:

  It’s perfectly fine to be upset. I can tell you I feel frustrated too.

No. 1-3 win teams are bad. Or a team missing a key figure like a QB. Even teams that most people would class as good lose to middling teams.

 Yes Tepper wants to win. And? You expect an owner to say he wants to lose? If he’s so intolerant of losing why is RR still in charge? Maybe DT understands that knee-jerk reactions are the response of those who aren’t in control of their own reactions.

Because midseason firings don't change anything.

Rivera has been here eight years.  It's not "knee jerk" to fire a guy who's been here that long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I am in the minority but besides the Steelers game all of our losses were close games. When a team consistently loses close games I put majority of the blame on the coaching. 

It is the coaches job to put the players in positions to succeed and if the out come is continuously the same, it is the coaches job to make the correct changes. I think all of us see the Fact that Ron refuses to make any changes. 

Our defense sucks and Ron was still trying to play clock killing offense and rely on a terrible defense to hold one score leads. Yeah it is the players fault that they can’t stop the offense but a competent coach should never put a lousy defense in that situation to begin with. Let alone doing it week after week like something is going to magically change.

I can’t even count the number of times Ron has run out the clock before half instead of trying to score points or stalling the offense and settling for a FG instead of going for 6 to kill some extra clock. 

Please just fire Ron already. I think we are all ready for change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thefuzz said:

That's the thing though.

How many 2 time coach of the year, 1 time NFL MVP, and 1 time DPOY led teams are losing to the Lions and Bucs?  Much less 5 mediocre teams in a row?

Well BB’s patriots for one. I’m not going to do it but I bet if you went through the current play off teams to find average or worse teams they lost to you would find a few results that would make you scratch your head.

I completely agree that 4 in a row to these teams is abysmal. I like many others probably identified this as the soft part of the schedule. It’s been a disaster. But those teams still aren’t terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seoul_Panther said:

Well BB’s patriots for one. I’m not going to do it but I bet if you went through the current play off teams to find average or worse teams they lost to you would find a few results that would make you scratch your head.

I completely agree that 4 in a row to these teams is abysmal. I like many others probably identified this as the soft part of the schedule. It’s been a disaster. But those teams still aren’t terrible.

BB has made a career of beating the teams he should beat, and rarely losing to the teams he should lose to.  That is not where Ron Rivera finds himself.

I wouldn't mind a couple head scratchers per year....if you average 11-12 wins per...but that ain't where we are either.

As to the "but those teams aren't terrible" comment...I agree, the NFL doesn't put out many "terrible" teams year in and year out...however, we sure are losing to a lot of the "not so good/below average teams"....of which we are one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because midseason firings don't change anything.

Rivera has been here eight years.  It's not "knee jerk" to fire a guy who's been here that long.

You’re not seeing the irony are you? You quote DT’s commitment to winning to establish equivalence to your view, but ignore the fact that he isn’t running round like a headless chicken like some in the huddle.

 I never said that it was knee jerk to fire Rivera so don’t put words in my mouth. I’m calling out hysterical overstatement as knee-jerk. Despite supporting RR I’m ready to see him replaced too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Seoul_Panther said:

You’re not seeing the irony are you? You quote DT’s commitment to winning to establish equivalence to your view, but ignore the fact that he isn’t running round like a headless chicken like some in the huddle.

 I never said that it was knee jerk to fire Rivera so don’t put words in my mouth. I’m calling out hysterical overstatement as knee-jerk. Despite supporting RR I’m ready to see him replaced too.

Actually, according to reports, Tepper is pondering firing his head coach (probably his GM too).

So is he overreacting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Related: Wanna hear something really depressing?

I ran the numbers comparing the years under Hurney / Rivera with the ones under Hurney / John Fox.

Rivera and Hurney have compiled a winning percentage of .422

Rivera and Fox were .513, and yes that includes the 2010 season.

Ouch :fear:

(Gettleman / Rivera was .621 if you're wondering)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Related: Wanna hear something really depressing?

I ran the numbers comparing the years under Hurney / Rivera with the ones under Hurney / John Fox.

Rivera and Hurney have compiled a winning percentage of .422

Rivera and Fox were .513, and yes that includes the 2010 season.

Ouch :fear:

(Gettleman / Rivera was .621 if you're wondering)

Fox had Berlien (I think), Peete, DelHomme, and Clausen.  Rivera has had Cam the whole time.  Roles reversed, Rivera never lasts as long as Fox did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually, according to reports, Tepper is pondering firing his head coach (probably his GM too).

So is he overreacting?

No because he’s pondering. Any action that he takes and goodness I hope he does get rid of RR will be done carefully and deliberately in contrast to some of the huddles takes. That is my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...