Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O-line is a bigger need than D-line


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

Both are pretty big needs, but not sure it is worse than the state of our DL. If we are able to get Williams and he stays healthy, we have 2 good bookend tackles and Trai is still a solid RG. Larsen did decent filling in for Kalil last season (run blocking was weak, but did well in pass protection). LG is definitely a weakness, but you can find solid guards in the mid rounds of the draft.

We are old at DE and do not have much young talent there. At DT, Kyle Love is getting older, Butler will be gone, Poe is a bust, and KK might be declining (more likely just lazy once he got his contract). D-line is a bigger need IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

Williams and Moton are mediocre, Van Roten and Kalil are horrible 

You're wrong about Williams and Moton. Kalil will retire and Larsen is honestly an upgrade at this point in their careers and I said that last year. Van Roten is a JAG and I'd love to see some competition for him next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're wrong about Williams and Moton. Kalil will retire and Larsen is honestly an upgrade at this point in their careers and I said that last year. Van Roten is a JAG and I'd love to see some competition for him next year.

Watch film and stop paying attention to Pff, Williams is trash and Moton is mediocre. Starting from center to LG our line is a disaster. Larsen is a jag that won’t make a 53 man roster on another franchise 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • https://wfnz.com/schedule/the-clubhouse-with-kyle-bailey/ Starts around 1100 I am not sure how connected Al Wallace is but he thinks bryce is going to get paid (50+) and it may happen within the first 4 games of this season.   He thinks the offense looked good last season.  Not really sure what the hell he was watching.
    • Waiting to see how the OT situation plays out is probably going to be a big part of the calculus.
    • If you draft players who can push the starters in competitions, then you have depth.  Gantt's focus is Week 1, 2026.  That is never my view.  if your focus is on talent alone, and if you do not consider the salary cap, then this is accurate.  If a player making $25m per season can be traded or not renewed because you have a player on a rookie contract who can do the job almost as well--before the maturation and experience occurs, then you may take a small step back for a moment so that you can leap forward later.  About Walker--LTs have done pretty well in Green Bay's system.  He is a good pass protector, and so is Freeling. About DT--they are often rotational.  Hunter will still play and he will improve with experience.  The WR field is not that crowded.  If you have 5 different WRs who can play, they usually do.  Hecht might have the best opportunity to take a starting job, and he is a fifth rounder.   So you look at the cap and the idea is to start as many on rookie contracts as possible.  Does that mean to start rookies day 1.  Nope.  
×
×
  • Create New...