Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did Cam Newton tank the 2018 season to get rid of Rivera?


Jangler

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hammerin'Cam1 said:

We couldn't of just simply lost because we didn't execute at crucial times?

No we can't. If there is nothing wrong with Cam's shoulder, as you insist. Then he tried a power move on the Coach and why should I trust him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hammerin'Cam1 said:

General soreness.

Why does Cam have to be the reason for why we started losing? Why can't it be the fact that Funchess, two rookies, and no Olsen were being asked to threaten defenses down the field? or the fact that our defense couldn't get off the field thanks to a 29th ranked pass defense?

Our team the last 8 games would not have been any better with any other QB - QB was not the teams biggest problem for why we were losing.

or that Cam couldn't throw the ball 30 yards. nope it's everybody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hammerin'Cam1 said:

You fuging act like we have bonafide receivers that are savvy enough to consistently beat teams deep. And even if they consistently did beat teams deep, our offensive line wouldn't consistently hold up for deep routes, so what the fug is the point?

Our two best wide receivers were effectively rookies for fugs sake.

Kyle Allen didn't seem to have an issue throwing the ball deep, with two completions and two defensive pass interference calls in the Saints game, IIRC. 3 of the 4 long balls were to DJ Moore and Curtis Samuel. Ya know, those "effectively rookies".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...