Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Favorite draft prospect


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If he stays healthy he will be awesome.  Huge IF though.

Big if. I would just rather gamble in the position we are in. Most of the guys in our range are likely to be career role players. Either gamble on an elite talent or project guy. Another role player isn't going to make us a better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Big if. I would just rather gamble in the position we are in. Most of the guys in our range are likely to be career role players. Either gamble on an elite talent or project guy. Another role player isn't going to make us a better team.

Totally agree and also agree we need a big

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting to warmup more to Little

Feel his game will be Much better in the pros

He is better suited in the more spread out NBA game playing the 2/3 wing combo 

Vs the more congested college game playing the 3/4 combo playing some down low.

 

Kid has all the tools and defensive energy as Kawhi had coming out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Starting to warmup more to Little

Feel his game will be Much better in the pros

He is better suited in the more spread out NBA game playing the 2/3 wing combo 

Vs the more congested college game playing the 3/4 combo playing some down low.

 

Kid has all the tools and defensive energy as Kawhi had coming out

Where does he play?? You got Miles at SF and a log Jam at shooting guard..

Do we really need to add another wing until MKG and Batum are gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

Where does he play?? You got Miles at SF and a log Jam at shooting guard..

Do we really need to add another wing until MKG and Batum are gone. 

Just wing.

Play 2 wings, Miles at the 3, Little at the 2.

Kind of like Boston with Tatum at the 3 and Brown at the 2

 

I think the Monk train has sailed.  He needs to be a part of the up coming trade package next year.  Bacon backs up Little at the 2

 

 

 

IF Kemba gets resigned

PG: Kemba, Graham

SG: Little, Bacon

SF: Bridges, Batum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...