Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Kawann Short and Gerald McCoy be considered the best DT duo...ever?


Saca312

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

Returning to form" is going to be a theme this year. 

Agree about that.

Not only D-line (and defense as a whole)

But also...

Cam

Greg

Trai

Paradis

If those guys DO return to much of their best form, and the young guys like Samuel, Moore, Burns, Little and D-Jack live up to potential...

and Luke and CMC are their amazing selves...  Watch out NFL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

The front 7 on this team at this moment in time is probably one of the top 10 in NFL history based on talent.  Production is going to be the big question...

I think we have a chance to be a very good front 7 but top 10 in NFL history??? That is nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bronn said:

Both will basically be DE's now, soooo...

GOAT DT rotation in Panthers history so far was Jenkins/Buckner/Burton/Moorehead.

The whole line in 2003 was probably our best ever.

That said, our line this year could rival that.

3-4 DE.....which is a whole lot more like a DT than a 4-3 DE. But like the Rams did you can run a 3 man front without changing to a traditional 3-4 roles along the line. There was a lot of talk about this from the Rams last year in how Donald was used. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some folks think anytime the Panthers sign a FA with household name recognition it translates into a Super Bowl.  I realize big-time FA signings are very rare around here, kinda like winning the lottery, but the expectations should be tamped down a bit at least until a real game is played this fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CarolinaCat89 said:

Gerald McCoy's sacks been in decline each of the past few years. 

This concern you guys for a 31 yr old vegan? 

They've been steady the past two years and his QB hits are up. What numbers are you looking at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I think we have a chance to be a very good front 7 but top 10 in NFL history??? That is nuts.

I don't think it is at all.  I think this front 7 is substantially better than the 03 superbowl team, and that front 7 is regularly considered one of the best of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarolinaCat89 said:

Gerald McCoy's sacks been in decline each of the past few years. 

This concern you guys for a 31 yr old vegan? 

No his sacks have been pretty stable. At least 6 for 6 straight years.  If they'd declined from like 9 to 3 I'd be concerned, but if he adds 5 or 6 we're good. 

Screenshot_20190605-152110.thumb.png.160dd21cce8c5e6201b84e00ed31b7eb.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...