Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assuming Cam is out Sunday who do you start?


Randolph Panther

Considering Cam is out, who do you start Sunday  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Allen or Grier

    • Allen
      34
    • Grier
      26
    • Trade or sign someone else
      4


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Verge said:

I'm worried whatever QB we throw out there will get blown up by Chandler Jones.

We"ll run the piss outnof McCaffrey.  Arizona's run D is terrible while our OL and QB situation is as well

 

Just hope we dont wear down CMC because of this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

I guarantee he better than those two back ups we have..

https://www.tmz.com/2019/08/07/colin-kaepernick-posts-workout-video-nfl-still-ready/

 

 

not if winning Sunday is the goal.

Last time he was on a football field he was demoted to backup.  He is a backup that hasn't played in 3 years now.   In addition to being out of football to 3 years he doesn't know our offense. 

You couldn't even put him in to run the read option all game because again....he hasn't played football in 3 years and isn't in football shape. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Turnovers significantly outweigh anything else.  

The job is to score more than the other team. If you throw 2 TDs and 1 INT but the INT leads to no points that is far better than 0 TDs and 0 INTs. It isn't as black and white as you made an attempt for it to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...