cam newton wasn't on the sidelines because he was following the doctors orders

[tiger7_88]

3 hours ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Also odd how the eccentricities of quarterbacks like Gardner Minshew and Ryan Fitzpatrick garner far less criticism if not outright praise from certain people, even though they haven't done jack poo in their careers compared to Cam.

It's just so, so very odd.

Happenstance, sir.

MERE HAPPENSTANCE.

[Snake]

8 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

If true, hes not close to returning.

He's not. People saying he's going to be coming back after the bye are kidding themselves. Maybe 6 weeks but more 7 or 8. 

[iamhubby1]

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

He's not. People saying he's going to be coming back after the bye are kidding themselves. Maybe 6 weeks but more 7 or 8. 

 

    Why? He is working out now. Why should it take another month?

[cookinbrak]

6 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Why? He is working out now. Why should it take another month?

If the doctors didn't think he should attend the game for fear of overexuberance, what makes you think he can start running any time soon?

[micnificent28]

10 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Why? He is working out now. Why should it take another month?

Because they don't want him back and doesnt fit the cam is done narrative.

[iamhubby1]

2 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

If the doctors didn't think he should attend the game for fear of overexuberance, what makes you think he can start running any time soon?

 

    There is a thread about this. It is on page 3 of the topics list. I said working out. I did not say running.

[JawnyBlaze]

To me, generational talent is talent you only see once or twice a generation.  Cam is a talent we’ve never seen.  The ability to carry a team as much as he has with as little talent around him as he has is something probably only Brady has done in recent history, and Cam did it without competent coaching while Brady has had arguably the best coach (by hook or by crook) to ever coach. 

 It has nothing to do with wins and losses.  That’s the argument made by people (or supporters of people) who win because of others.  Is he the best QB ever?  No.  But he’s a talent we’ve never seen and probably won’t for a long time. Generational talent. 

[iamhubby1]

1 minute ago, micnificent28 said:

Because they don't want him back and doesnt fit the cam is done narrative.

 

    We have a QB that is borderline HOF. But yeah, let's go with the other guy. lol

 

    I must be naive, cuz I just can't believe folks still feel that way about football players.

[cookinbrak]

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    There is a thread about this. It is on page 3 of the topics list. I said working out. I did not say running.

Because in order to play football in another month, he might have to run. Or he can't play in another month. That was what you said, remember?

[iamhubby1]

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

To me, generational talent is talent you only see once or twice a generation.  Cam is a talent we’ve never seen.  The ability to carry a team as much as he has with as little talent around him as he has is something probably only Brady has done in recent history, and Cam did it without competent coaching while Brady has had arguably the best coach (by hook or by crook) to ever coach. 

 It has nothing to do with wins and losses.  That’s the argument made by people (or supporters of people) who win because of others.  Is he the best QB ever?  No.  But he’s a talent we’ve never seen and probably won’t for a long time. Generational talent. 

 

    How about "Revolutionary"? He did revolutionize the QB position. 

[iamhubby1]

Just now, cookinbrak said:

Because in order to play football in another month, he might have to run. Or he can't play in another month. That was what you said, remember?

 

    Okay, you win. Read the dang thread.

[JawnyBlaze]

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

    How about "Revolutionary"? He did revolutionize the QB position. 

That’s an additional adjective that could be used  

[iamhubby1]

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

That’s an additional adjective that could be used  

 

    Thank you, thank you very much.

[cookinbrak]

22 minutes ago, Snake said:

He's not. People saying he's going to be coming back after the bye are kidding themselves. Maybe 6 weeks but more 7 or 8. 

 

18 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Why? He is working out now. Why should it take another month?

 

10 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

If the doctors didn't think he should attend the game for fear of overexuberance, what makes you think he can start running any time soon?

 

6 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    There is a thread about this. It is on page 3 of the topics list. I said working out. I did not say running.

 

2 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Because in order to play football in another month, he might have to run. Or he can't play in another month. That was what you said, remember?

 

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Okay, you win. Read the dang thread.

Which part of this sequence are you having trouble with?