Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Gamble: "Play More Man"


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

“Like I said last year, I want to get on Larry Fitzgerald,” Gamble said. “That’s their go-to guy, and I just want to compete with that guy. I know he’s one of the great receivers in the league, so I feel like I want to get my name out there and play my best against him.”

That said, it seems highly unlikely Fox will change his game plan.

He rarely does.

At the very least, Gamble would like to see the Panthers play more man-to-man this week on the Cardinals.

“I think we’ve just got to play a lot more man, get tight on them, and not play too much zone,” Gamble said. “They can just dump it off in the zone... I think last year we played more zone, so it hurt us. I think we should play more man, to get closer and compete with those guys.”

More:

http://www.carolinagrowl.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=226:carolinas-no-1-ranked-pass-defense-faces-stiff-challenge-ahead&catid=1:articles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually what would happen is that Gamble would get a feel for a WRs speed, and then go to the defensive coordinator and ask to play him man-to-man. Turdo (in this case) would give Gamble a play or 2 where he is in man coverage. If Turdo didn't like the way things were looking (Gamble getting beaten) then he would call things off and go back to zone right away. I think this pissed Fox off. Turdo actually wanted man-to-man with a lot fo blitzing, but Fox loves zone coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just another example of Panther players being vocal about what they think.....

They are tired of Fox....Jenkins, Pep, and the entire team are tired of his flawed approach to the game. Gamble knows what will happen...they will play a soft scheme and front 4 rush...and get picked apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you guys are actually supporting the thought that Chris Gamble...... Chris Gamble should be given the nod to cover Larry Fitzgerald in man to man coverage?

Now, i'm not going to slag him too bad in this thread. But we don't have ONE SINGLE defensive back that we could trust against ANY legit number one WR in this league. Not one. Just because Gamble is the best smelling turd among a group of other turds does not make him a legit shutdown cornerback.

Before he goes out calling for a one on one matchup with the best in the league, maybe he needs to make ONE frackin play against anybody. One big pass deflection, one big interception, one big forced fumble..... anything. Chris Gamble has had his thumb up his ass the entire year. Forgive me if this more simple zone defense is not making you look like a superstar, Gamble, but it's not our job to make you look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually what would happen is that Gamble would get a feel for a WRs speed, and then go to the defensive coordinator and ask to play him man-to-man. Turdo (in this case) would give Gamble a play or 2 where he is in man coverage. If Turdo didn't like the way things were looking (Gamble getting beaten) then he would call things off and go back to zone right away. I think this pissed Fox off. Turdo actually wanted man-to-man with a lot fo blitzing, but Fox loves zone coverage.

I call bs and would like to see a link to this marvelous little story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you guys are actually supporting the thought that Chris Gamble...... Chris Gamble should be given the nod to cover Larry Fitzgerald in man to man coverage?

It beats the alternative which will be Fitzgerald in the slot against our 3rd CB or a linebacker. The Cardinals exploited us like crazy last year because the Panthers never adjusted and put Gamble on their best receiver. Like the Colts, if you aren't playing man and physical at the line, the Cardinals have a QB who will just wear you down finding holes in the zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That should have been this year. Tough to sell to anyone worth getting when this crew is going into year 3 on the hot seat. I still think keeping Evero will sink them all after last year's showing. If/when he is scapegoated they need to show improvement or it's likely to be so eone else's problem next year. I do agree in principle tho, it all should have happened after last year's problems. 
    • I've listened to some things that have calmed the "Bryce was flat out terrible" to just "he was really bad" in Week 1. It's Year 3 though, and that shouldn't be the barometer. I've got 1% hope left for Bryce, and that's just blind homerism coming out.  I'm scared that as much emphasis as the team places on advanced stats and PFF that the team *doesn't* think Bryce was that bad in Week 1. Couple that with so many of the QBs in the league looking rough, offense being down in general, and I feel like there's a lot of "what if's" going on in the building instead of facing the music.  Lose Week 2, and we should switch the main focus back to building/churning the roster, evaluating young guys, and hoping our next QB can have a Jayden Daniels level of impact. As we're all well too aware of, QB is a crapshoot a lot of the time. Admit we made a bad pick, and go draft another. And another. Repeat until correct.     
    • I wouldn't want any of those starting as a rookie on day 1.  That said, we need a vet, that is not Andy Dalton, that can be the starter while a prospect grows and learns on the sidelines.
×
×
  • Create New...