Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plenty of teams interested in Newton trade...


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Business? Yes.

Better long-term investment? No.

Trubisky isn't very good, and it's not like he's new. He's had plenty of time to show what he is, and what it is is a subpar quarterback.

Yes he's new ...and according to huddle standards this is too soon to judge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

What logic?

Trubisky is bad at playing QB.  I am not judging his injury.  I am judging his horrible play.  He has yet to show he has what is required to be a long term solution for anyone.  Most likely he will become a journeyman backup.

 

Ok get back to me when that happens...I assert he will continue to be  a starter ,barring injury, for most of his career...let's watch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Yes he's new ...and according to huddle standards this is too soon to judge...

No, he's not new.  And pretty much everyone outside of people that have some sort of allegiance to UNC can see that he's not good.

If he's still playing in the league next year, it'll most likely be as a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2019 at 5:31 PM, Mr. Scot said:

No, he's not new.  And pretty much everyone outside of people that have some sort of allegiance to UNC can see that he's not good.

If he's still playing in the league next year, it'll most likely be as a backup.

It has nothing to do with UNC...he will he a starter next year no doubt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2019 at 4:47 PM, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

I feel confident he will only be a starter for the rest of this year because the Bears don't have a choice.  Once they get an option, he is gone.

Ok ...get back to me if that happens......he would thrive in our offense no doubt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2019 at 4:17 PM, Mr. Scot said:

Business? Yes.

Better long-term investment? No.

Trubisky isn't very good, and it's not like he's new. He's had plenty of time to show what he is, and what it is is a subpar quarterback.

Newton is out of the longterm window ...so yes longterm Trubisky a much better value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tired of Cam said:

only in my dreams.......but that would be a celebration day....I think Hollywood may have a job for him, modeling or possibly a Movie Director (that's what he looked like in that crazy produced interview about All His Poor Troubles).  Grow -Up!

@rayzor you know what to do here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, heel31ok said:

Newton is out of the longterm window ...so yes longterm Trubisky a much better value.

I don't know how long Newton is going to be around, but I do know Trubisky isn't good enough.

Being lousy gets you booted quicker than being injured does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...