Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

tough questions: are our wide receivers mediocre?


Recommended Posts

Thinking about it a little more it's a legitimate question to wonder if the staff is maximizing their skillset and if that kind of evolution will actually happen under a defensive head coach. You see other teams like the Packers out there just turning it on after cleaning house in the offseason. Yes Rodgers is fantastic and a future hall of famer, but they won 6 total games last year and so far they're already 7-1 after retooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forty-Eight said:

Are you sold on Samuel? You better not if you’re not even sold on Moore

Different reasons.

I feel like Samuel has the tools to be great, but I don't see it happening.

What bothered me with Moore last season was it felt like way too many of his big plays came on gadget runs or end arounds and such rather than passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I think they would greatly benefit from an established veteran to take some of the workload off of them and a redzone target. Damn, I'd love to get AJ Green from the Bengals and kill two birds with one stone.

That's technically what Torrey Smith was imagined to be, I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mediocre is a fair term.  And to be honest, that still might be an upgrade given what we've had in recent years.

CMC is our best RB and WR.  Pure and simple.  I don't know how sustainable it is long-term to run so much of our offense through him, but I get why they do it.

 Olsen knows how to get open at TE, so as a collective group, I think we have enough talent.

Samuel can be inconsistent, but he still is getting open deep at least 2-3 times a game and we can't connect.

Moore makes tough catches and gets nice YAC, but he has also made some awful mistakes you can't have from your WR1.

The WR group isn't setting the world on fire, but they're not bad either.

Norv's offense isn't predicated on having to have a true WR1, but it's also true that with the limited time the offensive line is able to block, these guys aren't getting open consistently.

Nothing was going to matter on a day like today where the defense got gashed so severely on the ground.  It wasn't like SF was destroying us through the air.  They moved the ball some, and Kittle is a beast, but they didn't really need to an aerial attack for the most part.

But to your original point, this group is absolutely mediocre as of now.  I think they have the talent to be better (and I haven't thought that in years past), but it will require better line play to get there.

And these guys (especially Moore and Samuel) to be more consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a tough question. Our receivers are average. Moore is a solid # 2. Samuel is overrated as hell and should not be back after his rookie contract. Samuel is a nice offensive weapon but not at full time wr. 
 

If we don’t look at QB in the draft, it better be WR. Jeudy, Lamb, Ruggs and Higgins are all instant upgrade over Moore and Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Different reasons.

I feel like Samuel has the tools to be great, but I don't see it happening.

What bothered me with Moore last season was it felt like way too many of his big plays came on gadget runs or end arounds and such rather than passes.

That last paragraph describes Samuel more so D.J. Moore imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...