Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

tough questions: are our wide receivers mediocre?


Recommended Posts

Thinking about it a little more it's a legitimate question to wonder if the staff is maximizing their skillset and if that kind of evolution will actually happen under a defensive head coach. You see other teams like the Packers out there just turning it on after cleaning house in the offseason. Yes Rodgers is fantastic and a future hall of famer, but they won 6 total games last year and so far they're already 7-1 after retooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Forty-Eight said:

Are you sold on Samuel? You better not if you’re not even sold on Moore

Different reasons.

I feel like Samuel has the tools to be great, but I don't see it happening.

What bothered me with Moore last season was it felt like way too many of his big plays came on gadget runs or end arounds and such rather than passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I think they would greatly benefit from an established veteran to take some of the workload off of them and a redzone target. Damn, I'd love to get AJ Green from the Bengals and kill two birds with one stone.

That's technically what Torrey Smith was imagined to be, I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mediocre is a fair term.  And to be honest, that still might be an upgrade given what we've had in recent years.

CMC is our best RB and WR.  Pure and simple.  I don't know how sustainable it is long-term to run so much of our offense through him, but I get why they do it.

 Olsen knows how to get open at TE, so as a collective group, I think we have enough talent.

Samuel can be inconsistent, but he still is getting open deep at least 2-3 times a game and we can't connect.

Moore makes tough catches and gets nice YAC, but he has also made some awful mistakes you can't have from your WR1.

The WR group isn't setting the world on fire, but they're not bad either.

Norv's offense isn't predicated on having to have a true WR1, but it's also true that with the limited time the offensive line is able to block, these guys aren't getting open consistently.

Nothing was going to matter on a day like today where the defense got gashed so severely on the ground.  It wasn't like SF was destroying us through the air.  They moved the ball some, and Kittle is a beast, but they didn't really need to an aerial attack for the most part.

But to your original point, this group is absolutely mediocre as of now.  I think they have the talent to be better (and I haven't thought that in years past), but it will require better line play to get there.

And these guys (especially Moore and Samuel) to be more consistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a tough question. Our receivers are average. Moore is a solid # 2. Samuel is overrated as hell and should not be back after his rookie contract. Samuel is a nice offensive weapon but not at full time wr. 
 

If we don’t look at QB in the draft, it better be WR. Jeudy, Lamb, Ruggs and Higgins are all instant upgrade over Moore and Samuel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Different reasons.

I feel like Samuel has the tools to be great, but I don't see it happening.

What bothered me with Moore last season was it felt like way too many of his big plays came on gadget runs or end arounds and such rather than passes.

That last paragraph describes Samuel more so D.J. Moore imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...