Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Player wish list for the next CBA


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

The Athletic: Players wish list for the next CBA

(subscription required)

Our old buddy Thomas Davis is one of the people interviewed here.

Basically, the most common wants are as follows:

Lifetime health care (pretty much every player interviewed mentioned that in some form)

A bigger slice of the pie (looking for a 50-50 cut on revenues, or at least something closer to it)

More guaranteed money (not necessarily fully guaranteed contracts but more so than now)

No expanded schedule (that discussion is pretty much a non-starter for the players)

FYI: It's referenced several times in the article that the NFL has pretty much given up on the idea of an 18 game schedule, but they're still trying to push for 17. Doesn't really sound like players are up for that idea either.

As always, I recommend reading the full article if you've got a subscription. If you don't, trust me it's worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to look it up.

I'm going to guess they'd have to set a minimum qualifying criteria for that, maybe three to five years or something.  Wouldn't make sense to offer lifetime healthcare to somebody who sat on a team's practice squad for six months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will be lucky to get even half that. The only bargaining chip they really have to play is expanding the schedule. I suspect they use that to get another point or two on the revenue and the health care and we end up with a 17 game season where the extra game is an international game. That doesn’t even get into Goodell’s absolute power in disciplinary matters, relaxing marijuana testing or the franchise tag. They aren’t getting guaranteed salaries written into the CBA. No league actually has that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bartin said:

They will be lucky to get even half that. The only bargaining chip they really have to play is expanding the schedule. I suspect they use that to get another point or two on the revenue and the health care. That doesn’t even get into Goodell absolute power in disciplinary matters, relaxed marijuana testing or the franchise tag. They aren’t getting guaranteed salaries written into the CBA. No league actually has that.

The NFL has already dropped the 18 game proposal.

Doesn't really sound like 17 games is going to fly either. They tie that in to the healthcare / player safety thing, their point being that asking them to play more games than they already are is detrimental to their well being.

(and they're right)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The NFL has already dropped the 18 game proposal.

Doesn't really sound like 17 games is going to fly either. They tie that in to the healthcare / player safety thing, their point being that asking them to play more games than they already are is detrimental to their well being.

(and they're right)

That’s all fine and dandy, but they are going to the negotiating table with literally nothing else to offer and a list of demands a mile long. Something has to give. An extra game, an extra bye(so two total extra weeks of TV money) and a few more points on the revenue is going to translate to a ton of money to the players. Money usually talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bartin said:

That’s all fine and dandy, but they are going to the negotiating table with literally nothing else to offer and a list of demands a mile long. Something has to give. An extra game, an extra bye(so two total extra weeks of TV) and a few more points on the revenue is going to translate to a ton of money to the players. Money usually talks.

I mean it's expected to be a typical bargaining thing. They'll go in asking for the moon in the hope of coming back with the stars and the NFL will do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The NFL has already dropped the 18 game proposal.

Doesn't really sound like 17 games is going to fly either. They tie that in to the healthcare / player safety thing, their point being that asking them to play more games than they already are is detrimental to their well being.

(and they're right)

They could expand rosters. More players to rotate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I mean it's expected to be a typical bargaining thing. They'll go in asking for the moon in the hope of coming back with the stars and the NFL will do the same.

Do you expect them to get anything major without giving up something significant in return? At best, I can see some sort of relaxation of marijuana and possibly some health care expansion just because it’s a PR win for the owners but I really can’t see anything else without conceding on an extra game.

The owners will always win in a lockout situation. I don’t care how much the NFLPA says they have saved. The rank and file on minimum and rookie contracts far outnumber the stars who have enough money to wait out the storm and each vote counts the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Do you expect them to get anything major without giving up something significant in return? At best, I can see some sort of relaxation of marijuana and possibly some health care expansion just because it’s a PR win for the owners but I really can’t see anything else without conceding on an extra game.

The owners will always win in a lockout situation. I don’t care how much the NFLPA says they have saved. The rank and file on minimum and rookie contracts far outnumber the stars who have enough money to wait out the storm and each vote counts the same.

They got more out of the last negotiation than I expected them to.

Whether they will or not this time? Don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

How is healthcare provided for players currently? The lifetime healthcare aspect is probably the most important of all of these and something that I have frequently wondered about, given how much of a beating the players take. 

Currently, a vested player (3 accrued seasons) can receive healthcare for 5 years after they stop playing.  You want to see all the current benefits check the link.

https://www.playsmartplaysafe.com/resource/nfl-benefits/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

They got more out of the last negotiation than I expected them to.

Whether they will or not this time? Don't know.

Well they had plenty of things to give up in 2011. The big ones being the rookie scale contracts and expanded disciplinary powers.

Maybe they can get contracts that are more guaranteed since that doesn’t really affect the owners bottom line. With a hard salary cap, all guaranteed contracts will do is redistribute the money from good and healthy players to washed up and broken players since teams will just have to carry the guaranteed money of guys that can’t play on their cap which will reduce the money effectively available to be spent on the active players. That will really screw over the already thin middle class in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...