Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Donte No Action Jackson

Forty-Eight

By Forty-Eight,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted

Well they are both fast but worthless.

i would trade them both.

hell, right now with a new coach and GM I would trade CMac for like a Khalil Mack trade, get another for Luke, and have like 3 first rounders and some extra 2nd and 3rds for Samuel and Jackson.

can we trade Short too?

just blow this bitch up scorched earth.

sign Cam to a 3 year team friendly comeback deal where if he come back strong it can be renegotiated but if not he can be traded.

like Arnold “I will clean house”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted

Part of me thinks he has the talent but he’s not the type Rivera knows how to coach into producing. I mean he’s similar to Norman attitude and discipline-wise and Rivera benched Norman out of frustration of not being able to coach him properly and only returned due to sheer desperation after the secondary went to poo and Norman lit it up.

 

at this point I have no trust in Rivera and his personnel bullshit and I honestly can’t tell anymore, just get rid of him three years ago already

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Forty-Eight Newbie

Forty-Eight

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, JARROD said:

Well they are both fast but worthless.

i would trade them both.

hell, right now with a new coach and GM I would trade CMac for like a Khalil Mack trade, get another for Luke, and have like 3 first rounders and some extra 2nd and 3rds for Samuel and Jackson.

can we trade Short too?

just blow this bitch up scorched earth.

sign Cam to a 3 year team friendly comeback deal where if he come back strong it can be renegotiated but if not he can be traded.

like Arnold “I will clean house”

I don’t want to but I would consider it trading CMC and Luke bc they are both too great to be on this team. Wasting talents away. CMC and Luke could net is at least a 1st rounder each. 
 

Trade Short, Jackson and Samuel for 6th rounders. That’s what they worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBoy95 Experienced

PantherBoy95

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

Now, we know why there were so much hype about Curtis Samuel in camp. All the veteran dbs couldn’t get him to listen to them last year (All or Nothing). It’s proving right now that the kid just don’t want to be a professional but depending on talents alone. 

Mind elaborating a litte on what happened in All or Nothing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Forty-Eight Newbie

Forty-Eight

Posted
  • Author
Posted
23 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

Mind elaborating a litte on what happened in All or Nothing?

During the week of Pittsburgh that we got blown out, Imamura was talking to Jackson alone trying to get him to stay focus. Jackson did nothing but talked back like an asshole telling Imamura to quit worrying just because he’s a rookie. He told Imamura that everyone baby him just bc he’s a rookie.
 

later, Adams, Cap and Reid sat down to talk with Jackson about making mistakes as he was going to be covering Antonio Brown. Told Jackson that he keeps repeatedly making the same mistakes but the INTs are hiding his bad plays. But the mistakes don’t hide from the rest of the dbs bc they are out there with him. Jackson again just pretty much ignored them. Jackson told them he’s frustrated hearing everyone telling him to stay focus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JARROD Contributor

JARROD

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

I don’t want to but I would consider it trading CMC and Luke bc they are both too great to be on this team. Wasting talents away. CMC and Luke could net is at least a 1st rounder each. 
 

Trade Short, Jackson and Samuel for 6th rounders. That’s what they worth.

I’m thinking 2nd and a couple of 4th rounders for the 2 squirts.

Luke would get a 1st and then some for a 4-3 team. 
 

CMac is a generational talent. Like trading Marshall Faulk. 2 first rounders and maybe some players.

The only player I wouldn’t trade unless it’s a last resort is Cam. It’s just so hard to get another quarterback and his foot is a freako injury.

however, in the spirit of blowing this bitch up,.. if Chicago wanted to pony up the farm for him like they did Mack...

then I guess Cam will love adding some more funky coats and gloves to his collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Trinidad Chambliss

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I mean, Brees was a sub 6' guy too(although they listed him as 6 foot). It is not a worry if you are an elite player. Even Flutie Flakes was able to succeed at the NFL level at his height. All QB's still need throwing lanes and different QB's play the game in a way that maximizes their abilities so they can be successful. All these sub-6 QB's we are talking about have had more NFL success that easily 80+% of 6-3 or better NFL QB's. That's why I keep beating this horse. It isn't about measurables, it's about abilities. That extends well beyond the QB position. Xavier Legette has elite abilities and measurables. Yet a slight little midget with no where near the athleticism is an infinitely better WR(McConkey). Jonathan Mingo is way more athletic than Puka Nacua. How is that working out? Never hyperfocus on measurables. It's a small part of a much bigger picture.   
    • Waldo
      Trinidad Chambliss

      By Waldo · Posted

      His legs looked limited in school to me. Good enough at that level but it never looked NFL level. All the guys you mentioned made Bryce look slow and limited. What propped him up was other non-NFL level guys on the field.  Absolutely on the 2nd part. That's becaude when he bails he doesn't have to ability to make it work more often. Lots of times this year and past teams let him scramble because they obviously didn't see it as a serious threat. Hell Payton was allowed to run because he was so slow and took off so infrequently. Bryce isn't that bad but he is closer to that than to Murray. 
    • Tr3ach
      Trinidad Chambliss

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      This.  Its not tennessee bad, but the Ole Miss offense is a very hard one to correlate to nfl.
×
×
  • Create New...