Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets going after Drummond

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted

2075238861_ScreenShot2019-11-22at12_55_29PM.png.ce929a772166f6d90cbea3dcc51ff4d1.png

 

We are probably offering Biz and MKG.. 2 expiring contracts.. might have to throw in Monk and take back a scrub..

For the record - I don't know if I would do anything like this because it occupies a lot of cap space we would have to work with.. but next years FA class is garbage and it's not like we would net any of the top prospects.. if we can manage to throw in Batum instead of Biz or MKG - I would do it in a heart beat. Maybe Zeller and MKG?? or Batum and Monk??

 

EVERYBODY TO THE TRADEMACHINE!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

trading for Drummond and/or Griffin would probably eliminate us from drafting high enough for Edwards or anyone in the Top10

Than wait till the offseason.. When he is a fa and we have money.. There is no reason we should give up our top 3 pick this year.. 

Don't want Griffin at all.. And if Jordan does tell him to fug off and sell more shoes..

If we can't trade for Drummond without losing our 1st round pick , Miles, PJ or Graham then wait till the offseason or move on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...