Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gaulden gone


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Toomers said:

5 drafts

3 All Pro OL and Moton

All-Pro DT and Star

Shaq and Bradberry- we will see there value real soon. 
 
OH......CMC 

Even KB was a 1,000 Yd. WR when healthy and brought a 3rd. 
 

How about you post Hurneys last 5 drafts and see how it compares. 

5 drafts -> 6-8 good players. And some wonder why we have no depth at some positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toomers said:

Ok. I guess I need to do this again. 
 

  So if I’m a pure Gettleman homer, like you are for Hurney, I would never say anything bad about Gettleman or good about Hurney? Right? So how can I pull numerous posts and threads where I do just that? You ready? Because I expect someone accusing someone else of complete bias to have some proof of these statements. 
 

   Put your money where your mouth is. I got mine ready. How about you? This is the part where you bring some data or go the hell away. As usual. 

This is going to be a fun time when Hurney is still in the league and Gettleman is officially retired after turning the Giants into one of the worst rosters in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

SMH, don’t remind me. I was unsure about Donte more so because I didn’t know anything about him. Gaulden was awful right from the start. Worst athlete at DB at the combine. I would have traded up to get Justin Reid (85 and 88 would have gotten it done) or sat tight and took Harrison.

I just laugh when people say we took an athlete and tried to find a position when he was the worst DB athlete at the combine. We took a way under average NFL athlete and tried to make it work. His ten cent head shown at Tennessee showed up to help us lose. I still have no idea how he got lucky enough to get an offsetting penalty on that stupid push after the whistle.

Kind of plays into my theory that Hurney/Rivera is essentially Rivera.

I mean, who is it we know that doesn't really care about having athletic safeties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Some years back, I heard a long time personnel guy talk about how much he despised when coaches got involved in draft evaluation.

Coaches, he said, had a terrible tendency to fall in love with a certain player off of a couple of highlights rather than looking at the big picture.

I just remember his first press conference, and he mentioned Hoke about a half dozen times. I do tend to agree with what that personnel guy said. 

It also makes me wonder just how much of a role our own scouting department plays in our draft process.  Late picks and UDFA's?? Would make sense seeing how they are broken down in subgroubs..i.e.. regional scouts.

This year's draft for instance..

1.) Burns (Hurney pick)

2.) Little (Hurney pick)

3.) Grier (Turner influenced)

4.) Miller (Scouting Dept??)

5.)Scarlett (Scouting Dept??)

6.) Daley ( I'd bet Wharton influenced / Scouting Dept )

UDFA's (Scouting Dept...although we didn't have many since we picked up alot of players from that league that lasted a half season (I forget the name).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Why do you always come to the rescue when somebody doesn't say something nice about Gettleman? It's like you have google alerts or something of that nature.

  I could ask you the same thing. Only difference.  is, I discuss many different topics. All yours point to one thing. 
 

  And it is usually to dispute a Hurney fairy tale like yesterday when you gave Josh Norman abilities to create an alternate universe and solve every problem a team could have. Would you like to explain that BS again? 
 

   So if you would quit making poo up, I wouldn’t say a word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Williams is awful,  Shaq is average and will be overpaid. KB is a bust that got a lil attention from garbage time stats.

Williams wasn't awful before his injury. Shaq is playing well in this travesty of a defense Ron has created. Even Luke looks like a shell of his former self trying to play this gap control defense. KB isn't quite as easy to call a bust. He was doing well his rookie season. ACL injury followed by a traumatic personal loss and he spiraled. I'm not saying he would have been all pro, or even made a pro bowl, I'm just saying it's hard to predict how people will respond. When my mother in law passed, my father in law was living in grief for almost 3 years until he passed as well. He couldn't function in normal society. Grief hits people different ways and can last a long time. KB had a lot of potential, and he showed it, he was just never the same after those 2 things happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  I could ask you the same thing. Only difference.  is, I discuss many different topics. All yours point to one thing. 
 

  And it is usually to dispute a Hurney fairy tale like yesterday when you gave Josh Norman abilities to create an alternate universe and solve every problem a team could have. Would you like to explain that BS again? 
 

   So if you would quit making poo up, I wouldn’t say a word. 

Lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ColumbusCounty said:

I just remember his first press conference, and he mentioned Hoke about a half dozen times. I do tend to agree with what that personnel guy said. 

It also makes me wonder just how much of a role our own scouting department plays in our draft process.  Late picks and UDFA's?? Would make sense seeing how they are broken down in subgroubs..i.e.. regional scouts.

This year's draft for instance..

1.) Burns (Hurney pick)

2.) Little (Hurney pick)

3.) Grier (Turner influenced)

4.) Miller (Scouting Dept??)

5.)Scarlett (Scouting Dept??)

6.) Daley ( I'd bet Wharton influenced / Scouting Dept )

UDFA's (Scouting Dept...although we didn't have many since we picked up alot of players from that league that lasted a half season (I forget the name).

It won't surprise me if that whole department gets reorganized.

I mean heck, our Director of Pro Personnel - i.e. the department that analyzes guys like Matt Paradis - is Jerry Richardson's grandson.

(though I'm sure that had nothing to do with his getting promoted to that job) :Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It won't surprise me if that whole department gets reorganized.

I mean heck, our Director of Pro Personnel - i.e. the department that analyzes guys like Matt Paradis - is Jerry Richardson's grandson.

(though I'm sure that had nothing to do with his getting promoted to that job) :Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

A Richardson is still involved with the org...lol wow. That must have been a stipulation along with the statue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

A lot of those players aren't on the team anymore, and more won't be by next season.

And what does that have to do with if they were good picks or not? That’s not what you said. 

 

10 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Williams is awful,  Shaq is average and will be overpaid. KB is a bust that got a lil attention from garbage time stats.

  After injuries. Was he a 4th round pick who had an all pro season? Yep. Helluva lot better than an Amini. Or nothing.  
 

   KB also an injury, was producing. Better than anyone else. And had value when he left. Unlike most Hurney picks. 
 

   Shaq will get paid. That’s what matters. Everette Brown won’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most successful teams take system fit pretty seriously in their drafting process. I'm not so sure we do.

I thought that was common knowledge. After all, the only thing we hear around draft season is "BPA." If this were truly a "BPA" team, Rivera would be changing the system to optimize the player's talents, much like Andy Reid has evolved with the Chiefs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Could be true and might be the reason we did better with Gettleman who didn’t get railroaded regardless if he wasn’t a great GM. Doesn’t make Marty any better. We need someone who knows his poo and can help improve the team.

We’ve always won when we had talent that played well. I’ve never felt like Ron ever out coached opponents. That’s why our good in division opponents can be 12-2 against us the past 4 years. Even perennial cellar dwellers Tampa is 4-4 against us the past 4 years.

I'd agree it doesn't make Marty any better.

But yeah, Gettleman obviously wasn't shy about telling Ron when he was full of sh-t. I don't know that Hurney's got a strong enough personality to win those kind of debates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

And what does that have to do with if they were good picks or not? That’s not what you said. 

 

  After injuries. Was he a 4th round pick who had an all pro season? Yep. Helluva lot better than an Amini. Or nothing.  
 

   KB also an injury, was producing. Better than anyone else. And had value when he left. Unlike most Hurney picks. 
 

   Shaq will get paid. That’s what matters. Everette Brown won’t. 

Williams being all-pro is equivalent to Tolbert being all-pro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anybodyhome said:

I thought that was common knowledge. After all, the only thing we hear around draft season is "BPA." If this were truly a "BPA" team, Rivera would be changing the system to optimize the player's talents, much like Andy Reid has evolved with the Chiefs. 

Valid, but ask yourself, do you really want to see Ron Rivera trying to do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...