Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Little to IR


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

It's going to be difficult getting this defense back on track when you have to keep drafting the same positions on O-line...

Just chalk this 3-4 experiment up to a waste and go back to this team's strength in a 4-3.  IMMEDIATE improvement.  We've invested in Burns, outside of that, most of our core players on defense still are better suited to the 4-3.  I know Luke would be thrilled.  He (and virtually everyone else on defense) has looked like a duck out of water this year.  Please don't retort with the one-year 3-4 rentals; they won't be here next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Because dominants left tackles are always available in FA or made available in trade by their teams. I’m with you bro, let’s go get one. Just point out to Hurney which one you want.

 

Thats available.

 

It is smarter to develop the 22-year old rookies you drafted this year than to keep picking OTs every year.  Coach them up--most first rounders take some time to develop. Little and Daley have the tools--coach them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Because dominants left tackles are always available in FA or made available in trade by their teams. I’m with you bro, let’s go get one. Just point out to Hurney which one you want.

 

Thats available.

Asinine comments are unnecessary. A dominate LT can be acquired via trade for the right price/draft pick/player. Trades happen all the time in the NFL. Will this happen for us, whose to say. But I'm saying I'd prefer to explore the trade option first.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

Asinine comments are unnecessary. A dominate LT can be acquired via trade for the right price/draft pick/player. Trades happen all the time in the NFL. Will this happen for us, whose to say. But I'm saying I'd prefer to explore the trade option first.

 

 

You say asinine. I say skeptical. True, trades happen all the time in the NFL.  Please name for me the last dominant LT who was traded while healthy and productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

 

It is smarter to develop the 22-year old rookies you drafted this year than to keep picking OTs every year.  Coach them up--most first rounders take some time to develop. Little and Daley have the tools--coach them.

 

Shhhhh

I’m making a point about the availability of dominant LT’s in FA and trade. I’m with you but I’m doing this thing right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Save this post:

It is too early to give up on Little and/or Daley.  Our OL needs a dominant center more than a T, and it is not even close.

Middle pressure led to a lot of sacks.

I agree that it's too early to give up on them, but on the flipside, if you're part of the new regime and you willing to put all of your eggs in the Little/Daley basket?

I expect us to take an OL early either way. Even if Little and Daley both end up panning out Paradis looks like a bust of a FA signing, Turner's cap hit makes a huge leap and he's looked like a JAG since getting paid anyway, Moton is going into the last year of his contract, and Van Roten and Larsen are career backups IMO. Even if Little and Daley prove to be the real deal, we STILL need OL help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Paradis is the center. We wont be drafting or acquiring one whether you like it or not. He's getting paid top 3 center money its not happening so quit thinking we are going to get a center. Sign a stud left guard and draft a middle round tackle that can play guard as well and hope Little and Daley can develop. I think if we sign someone like Norwell who will get let go and Paradis gets healthy we can be okay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Well Paradis is the center. We wont be drafting or acquiring one whether you like it or not. He's getting paid top 3 center money its not happening so quit thinking we are going to get a center. Sign a stud left guard and draft a middle round tackle that can play guard as well and hope Little and Daley can develop. I think if we sign someone like Norwell who will get let go and Paradis gets healthy we can be okay. 

That's been the fatal flaw with Hurney; he's taken too many fliers on guys he 'hopes' will pan out or "develop".  Let's get the asterisks out of the way,  *not first rounders.

We better be darn sure our LT is solid for the foreseeable future.  Sure Daley and Little flashed at times, but nothing about either of those guys screams franchise LT to me.  Adequate starters at LT?  Adequate enough to give up a some sacks each game.  If we indeed get a rookie QB, that's the last thing this team needs is an inexperienced green-horn QB all jittery because he's getting plastered to the turf by edge rushers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That's been the fatal flaw with Hurney; he's taken too many fliers on guys he 'hopes' will pan out or "develop".  Let's get the asterisks out of the way,  *not first rounders.

We better be darn sure our LT is solid for the foreseeable future.  Sure Daley and Little flashed at times, but nothing about either of those guys screams franchise LT to me.  Adequate starters at LT?  Adequate enough to give up a some sacks each game.  If we indeed get a rookie QB, that's the last thing this team needs is an inexperienced green-horn QB all jittery because he's getting plastered to the turf by edge rushers.  

Completely  agree with this. Im just stating with the trade up and upside of our sixth round pick, we unfortunately aren't going to be signing or trading for a LT. Hurney put us in this situation whether it turns out good or bad, but we are stuck with Paradis and Turner for sure starting and Moton. Also with the investments in picks at LT we are likely stuck there, so we better upgrade at LG big time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

You say asinine. I say skeptical. True, trades happen all the time in the NFL.  Please name for me the last dominant LT who was traded while healthy and productive.

Because you call it skeptical doesn't make it any less asinine. You want to debate over something as if it can't happen. Even if it hasn't happened before doesn't mean that it can't happen at all.

Laremy Tunsil  and Jason Peters are pretty good Left Tackles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

Because you call it skeptical doesn't make it any less asinine. You want to debate over something as if it can't happen. Even if it hasn't happened before doesn't mean that it can't happen at all.

Laremy Tunsil  and Jason Peters are pretty good Left Tackles

Yeah. Lots of things.could happen, but are we talking about things that are realistic possibilities?  Tunsil  is a perfect example. Yes, he was traded, in his prime no less. Do you think the kings ransom it took to acquire him would be worth it for a team as depleted of talent as this one?

Can it be done? Maybe. Would what it would take be remotely worth it? Judging by the Tunsil trade my opinion is no way. Whether you consider that asinine is subjectively up to you, but the definition of asinine isn’t “anyone who disagrees with me”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Texans had to give up THREE first round picks for Laremy Tunsil, who isn't even an elite left tackle (in fact, he's pretty average)

All the left tackles drafted in the 1st round this year look like busts

Jason Peters was traded more than a decade ago, by a very dysfunctional, cheap, and terrible Buffalo Bills franchise at the time (and it was not yet known how great he would become).

They don't grow on trees, and we have two promising ones we're developing

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...