Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tua returning?


Panthercougar68

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Varking said:

It should come down to when you get the medicals. When do we find out how far along Tua is? If it is around the combine or during that time I could see it not bothering anyone. If we won't get an update on his health until or after the draft I think he would need to return to school. How many are going to want to take a first round risk on him if we aren't sure he is going to be good again. 

He will get full medicals at the combine and that will give teams an idea of his prognosis. Considering he is a QB and the absolute desperation some of these teams are going to have to get a franchise caliber QB(something he has shown the skill to possess) I think you will get more than one team willing to take a risk in the first round, probably multiple teams. It would have to be very bad news on the medicals for most teams to pass and if that is the case, going back to college is probably not going to raise his stock very much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget, Cowboys LB Jaylon Smith was a high 2nd round pick despite tearing up his knee and reportedly having nerve damage that at the time was rumored to bring into serious question his ability to play football moving forward and he would definitely have to sit out a full year before anyone would really know and QB >>>>> LB in importance.

If a badly damaged very talented LB is worth a high 2nd, I can't imaging a badly damaged very talented QB falling out of the 1st unless the medical evaluations are just beyond terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cmichd said:

Luck went back to school instead of coming to Carolina after his Jr. Year.  The reason we took Cam since he returned to school.

Luck was also financially set for life by birthright before he ever signed an NFL contract. Oliver Luck has an estimated $10M net worth. No clue what Tua's family economics look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Exactly, @45catfan the tanking would be something discussed with the new coach  it would be a strategy of how to get the franchise QB.

Also, tanking is probably still a bad term for a 5-11 team that lost 8 in a row and moves on from Cam. If this was after 2018, I wouldn’t be saying any of this. I’m saying it because if we move on from Cam we do legitimately have a chance to be the worst team in 2020. It’s not a stretch. The optimists May think we are a couple moves away. We aren’t.  

A healthy Cam being here will be the biggest factor in our 2020 success. None of these rookie QB's will be able to help us be as successful as a veteran like Cam. We can be a couple of moves away from being pretty successful with him......without him, it is potentially a pretty bad roster. 

As for the tanking, I know fans love to use that as an idea but it largely doesn't exist in the NFL. You are not easily going to convince a group of coaches(especially newly hired) and a roster of professional football players to intentionally not be competitive. These are some of the most competitive people around, so asking them to lay down and lose is not going to go over well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

With a healthy Cam, I honestly think we could be. Without... LOL, no. Not unless we get extremely lucky and land the next Mahomes at #7.

Saw a mock we would pick Eason out of Washington in the 2nd round.  Why do we keep picking back ups

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, CRA said:

I was anti-Herbert to begin with...

this just makes me triple down on Herbert and puts him in basically the category I had Clausen in.  Guaranteed NFL bust 

Yeah, he has the physical traits to be a really good one, I just don't think he has the mental makeup to be what he could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

But what real benefit does that title offer Tua

Marketing and (NFL)demand increase with prestige alone.

 

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

As far as more time to physically mature.....you mean dedicating 100% of your time to that like you would be able to do in the NFL versus the part-time that you would be doing that in the NCAA? 

Regardless of where (tho admittedly you have a good point) he will still be filling out.  

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Tua has an injury history and his stock is still high(for now, pending medicals). Why in the world would you gamble on that potentially changing with an injury or perhaps not being a top 3 QB prospect anymore(which could easily happen in next year's class)

My position is not without drawbacks.  Its not perfect.  That's why I said "buck the trend".  I.  ME.  MYSELF.  Want to see it.  Now, the next year's class of QBs thing I'm not the one to comment on that.  I have no idea.  So maybe?

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

It just doesn't make sense to take that risk. Those insurance policies will not pay what one rookie contract will.

People make different choices all the time.  Its obviously an option or we wouldn't be discussing it. 

I only know of their existence not the inner workings or payouts of such policies. And now we're splitting hairs on what is life changing money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Marketing and (NFL)demand increase with prestige alone.

 

Regardless of where (tho admittedly you have a good point) he will still be filling out.  

My position is not without drawbacks.  Its not perfect.  That's why I said "buck the trend".  I.  ME.  MYSELF.  Want to see it.  Now, the next year's class of QBs thing I'm not the one to comment on that.  I have no idea.  So maybe?

People make different choices all the time.  Its obviously an option or we wouldn't be discussing it. 

I only know of their existence not the inner workings or payouts of such policies. And now we're splitting hairs on what is life changing money.

College success will not drive more marketing demand, NFL success will. Same with NFL demand, the only impact that would have would be his health. The results of a consensus(and this may be debatable at this point) top 10 pick returning to school are typically not the best. It's one less year of an already short average career that you didn't spend adjusting and adapting to the NFL.

The insurance policies for someone like Tua would be in the low seven figure range(typically) and collecting on those policies can be challenging, much like any large insurance claim.  Banking on an insurance policy is a poor substitute for a guaranteed contract that a first round draft pick receives. McCaffery, as a #8 overall pick ended up banking $17,241,304 from his fully guaranteed contract as a #8 overall draft pick. Those figures typically rise each year and with the spot taken. So, again, why would you pass on that kind of opportunity? Even with tax implications that kind of money should allow you to live comfortably for the rest of your life. 

If Tua decides to return, that is his prerogative, but it would not make it any less of a foolish decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, cmichd said:

Saw a mock we would pick Eason out of Washington in the 2nd round.  Why do we keep picking back ups

 

I would not personally use a 2nd round pick on a QB because we have so many roster needs but taking a QB almost regularly is a wise idea. The percentage of hits, even in the first round, on QB's is fairly low so it takes a lot of shots before you strike gold. Look at the Steelers, who almost continually are taking young QB's to try and groom. Worst case scenario is that you end up with two high caliber QB's and have to make a difficult choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...