Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Wes21 said:

It may help some, it may not.  We have no idea yet.  I just laugh when people act like its not a real drug already in use.

They are just playing the pro vs anti Trump cards.  Neither really care about the drug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stirs said:

Bull is grinding his ax about this Chloroquine drug, you are grinding your ax against Trump.  I am just saying it has been used a few times and had limited success.  Neither it nor the Japanese drug will make it into our systems until fall, so no use getting excited, nor making it off limits for discussion.

I am not “grinding my ax against trump” on this. There is no evidence to suggest Chloroquine has had any effect in the way it’s being suggested, especially in severe cases. Much less being a “cure”. Where as the Japanese drug has show substantial benefit in mild to medium cases, stopping the disease from multiplying. Aka disease can’t multiply, disease dies.  

also, 

“And, more importantly, it can have dangerous side effects, as well as giving people false hope.

The latter has led to widespread shortages of hydroxychloroquine for patients who need it to treat malaria, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, the indications for which it was originally approved.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stirs said:

They are just playing the pro vs anti Trump cards.  Neither really care about the drug

Exactly

1 minute ago, stirs said:

Looks like in the end, another group might be in the coronavirus high risk group.  Diabetes we know, but just obesity?  We in trouble here in the US.  Biggie size, not good.

https://news.trust.org/item/20200408103237-l2epf

Obesity carries with it a ton of other issues along with it.  There is nothing healthy about being "fat," regardless of how much people want to call it acceptable.  The body starts to function differently after a person gets above a certain weight (each person is different).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

It may help some, it may not.  We have no idea yet.  I just laugh when people act like its not a real drug already in use, just so they can grind their axe a little more against Trump.  We get it.

And giving it to people it will have no effect on while endangering those who it’s actually approved for is just dumb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

Incorrect

““Whether hydroxychloroquine works in vivo is not proven for any virus, and in fact in randomised controlled trials against a number of viruses, including influenza, it doesn't work at all,” says Douglas Richman, a virologist and infectious disease physician at the University of California, San Diego.

Hydroxychloroquine has shown activity in vitro against many viruses, including influenza and coronaviruses, but that has largely failed to translate into success in either animals or humans. In 2005, the drug showed in vitro activity against SARS-CoV, which is closely related to the current pandemic virus, but it failed to decrease viral load in mice, and clinical interest drifted away, says Christopher Tignanelli, a surgeon at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, who is involved in clinical trials of COVID-19 treatments.

Although the existing evidence is thin, it is promising enough to warrant further study, says David Boulware, an infectious disease physician at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “When someone is sick in hospital, we throw the kitchen sink at them, but we don't always know if it works,” he says. “That's why we need clinical trials.””

These Paris researchers found that after five to six days of treatment with hydroxychloroquine (600 mg per day for 10 days) and azithromycin (500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 2 to 5), eight of the 10 patients still tested positive for COVID-19. 

Of these 10 patients, one patient died, two were transferred to the ICU and another had to be removed from the treatment due to serious complications.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

Stop it with chloroquine. No actual study or doctor backs this up as a definitive “treatment”. 

In fact the CDC just scrubbed it from the website. 

CDC was giving advice to docs on using the drug, but since it had not been through all clinical trials, some objected to it being on there like other drugs and they took it down.  Does not mean they have given up on it.  As I said, it would probably be fully vetted by fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

False Hope isn’t Hope. It’s fear mongering. 

2.2 million deaths is fear mongering.

Someone saying we are trying several new things that hold promise, is not bad.  But the President took it a bit beyond that.  He lets the cat out of the bag sometimes a bit too soon.  But, the media reports stuff like the Japanese drug, chloraquine, z paks, and a host of other things.  The internet is FULL of things that are entirely false, urban myths, etc.  What the president did is report on something that the media is already reporting on.  He did not use the right amount of caution on it, but did not do something so overtly wrong that requires the hair on fire reactions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/5/2020 at 2:56 PM, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

https://twitter.com/i/events/1246819682419494912

It shows that GWB had said all the right things saying it would be a good idea to be ready for any pandemic. We should have already had some kind of contingency plan in place for this kind of thing but unfortunately we were blindsided by our own countries failure to do just that. It is now to late for that now since we are in a state of disaster.

I hope to god you’re still in school. Make sure you pay close attention in English because this hurts my brain to read. There may still be hope for you. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...