Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Wait, so the growth curve has been greatly reduced... yet social distancing hasn't been going that well. Interesting.

And you mean the growth curve reduced from the predictions that were wildly inaccurate to begin with. Remember the Imperial College model?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

US military was almost not used in US outbreak so far... means US hospitals are handling it well.

Which was the whole point of social distancing and stay at home mandates all along. 

I just hope people actually understand this when stay at home mandates start getting lifted in the coming weeks. If they don't follow social distancing guidelines we'll see the second wave and everything will go right back to stay at home mandates again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.j

That's a cute response but it doesn't address the issue.  All of the things I've read suggest that the most effective strategy is suppression which is to stay under lockdown until a vaccine is developed. Because that's not possible, the next step is repeated mitigation which involves multiple lockdowns, on and off, until a vaccine is developed.  We've extended the curve but at what cost? We are going to go right back to lockdown when it flares up again?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

That's a cute response but it doesn't address the issue.  All of the things I've read suggest that the most effective strategy is suppression which is to stay under lockdown until a vaccine is developed. Because that's not possible, the next step is repeated mitigation which involves multiple lockdowns, on and off, until a vaccine is developed.  We've extended the curve but at what cost? We are going to go right back to lockdown when it flares up again?  

No. The stay at home orders were due to the transmission of the disease getting out of control because we waited too long to act. As the curve flattens over the coming days and significantly declines over coming weeks, you'll see stay at home orders start to lift. There will be a return to somewhat normalcy. The "somewhat" is in there because we will still need to follow social distancing protocols to prevent a second exponential rise in cases. If people follow those protocols, we can likely prevent any further stay at home mandates. But, the average person is really incredibly dumb and half of the people out there are even dumber than that... so, we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No. The stay at home orders were due to the transmission of the disease getting out of control because we waited too long to act. As the curve flattens over the coming days and significantly declines over coming weeks, you'll see stay at home orders start to lift. There will be a return to somewhat normalcy. The "somewhat" is in there because we will still need to follow social distancing protocols to prevent a second exponential rise in cases. If people follow those protocols, we can likely prevent any further stay at home mandates. But, the average person is really incredibly dumb and half of the people out there are even dumber than that... so, we'll see.

There's not really been high transmission outside of NYC, Detroit and New Orleans. Either we didn't act too late or there's something else going on.  I haven't really read about the hospitals being overwhelmed, most are operating under capacity right now and laying off workers. There are predictions out there (including the infamous IHME model) that assumed social distancing and they still went way overboard.  They have since significantly revised their projections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So big thing in US... all professional athletes are under contract and required to get paid during this outbreak.  For example... NFL team pays players on average of 170M per season (excluding staff).  There are 32 teams...  NFL might make no money but will require to pay salaries in billions.  That’s not sustainable. I know multiple soccer teams in Europe that have been around of almost century are going bankrupt due to player and staff salaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Own a business, have two kids and a wife and I would like to do this lock down thing one time.  So let’s do it right... even if it takes a little longer than we might prefer.  

How long are you willing to do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BIGH2001 said:

How long are you willing to do it?

that’s a really good question.  I guess as long as it takes?  But there’s definitely a breaking point.

its a tough spot for all of us and I wanna get things back to where they were as much as anyone.  But not if it means stop and go stop and go... I fear that will be worse for the economy in the long run.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

that’s a really good question.  I guess as long as it takes?  But there’s definitely a breaking point.

its a tough spot for all of us and I wanna get things back to where they were as much as anyone.  But not if it means stop and go stop and go... I fear that will be worse for the economy in the long run.
 

 

I don’t know if I trust anyone in charge to make the right decision on striking that balance.  I don’t know what kind of business you own but if it is public facing at all you are still going to have a large subset of the population who will be scared of their own shadow even after we are officially told we can go back to “normal.” I think that the media coverage of it has been over the top and fear mongering. Again, I get that we had to be warned so some of it was necessary but people have been given no hope. Its a dangerous thing. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well even if we took diverging paths getting there...our overall assessment of Shough is the same (bolded) lol so I guess that's what matters.  What you call "playing at a level that looks like a veteran starter" is the same thing I'm referencing when I talk about his poise.  Although I still wonder how truly "bad" of a team the Saints are.  Their defense is middle-of-the-road, and their offense does have some good pieces (Olave, Juwan Johnson) outside of running back which is the position most everyone agrees is relatively plug-and-play.  I'm not going to pretend to know anything about the majority of NFL team's o-lines lol but I'm assuming Saints are not great there, although Shough's pressure % seems to have been quite low (and steadily improving) over the last four weeks (20 -> 16.7 -> 15.0 -> 13.0) so maybe they've been playing better as of late, or perhaps Shough himself deserves credit for that.   Some of the language I'm hearing about Shough, including talking about how he's way above league average in several categories, makes it sound like Shough is having a rookie season on par with like a CJ Stroud who established himself as basically a Top 5-10 QB his rookie season.  Maybe that's on me though, I don't mean to attribute anything to you that I'm sure you don't agree with.
    • Since your being selective (and somewhat deceptive) with your comparisons, I'll throw this up so we can compare apples to apples. Both Young and Shough have played against the Rams. Young went: 15/20 (75%) for 191 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs with a 147.1 QB rating Shough went: 15/24 (62.5%) for 176 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT with a 81.2 QB rating   Both Young and Shough have played against the Buccs. Young went: 21/32 (65%) for 206 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs with a 102.5 QB rating Shough went: 13/20 (65%) for 176 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT with a 65.4 QB rating   Both Young and Shough have played against the Falcons. Young went: 31/45 (75%) for 448 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs with a 123.2 rating Shough went: 30/43 (69.7%) for 243 yards, 0TD, 1 INT with a 74 QB rating   Seriously, in what world is Shough a better QB.
    • Freddie? For this game? Seriously? I don’t get it. Hope we get the best version of Freddie tonight.
×
×
  • Create New...