Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sports Illustrated claims we have 48.1 million in dead money this season.


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

So we should give large contracts to players who have proven nothing? I find this argument rediculous because no one knows whats going to happen in the future.  All you can do is base it on past performance and hope it can continue, its what every GM does.  

  You sure don’t give out bad contracts 90% of the time. Which is exactly what 2.0 has done. Plus very “little” out of 2 drafts. How do you think this team got here? Yet, he’s still in charge and still has no clue which direction to go. Based on past performance, this team will suck for awhile. Who should get the blame for the worst roster situation in the NFL? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bronn said:

I'm of the thought that the Panthers believe that there won't be a 2020 NFL season or, at the very least, an abbreviated one.

They are pretty much cooking the books and hitting the reset button on the franchise at this point. They are betting that dead cap, etc. will void/come off the books or have a lessened impact moving forward.

1 year deals for backups with potential. I expect you'll see us start accumulating extra draft picks soon, somehow.

They're hoping they timed their reboot well, with the state of the world right now.

Most of our moves were made prior to this widespread panic, so I am not going to give credit to the organization for that. Tepper has also pretty much been warning he was going to nuke the franchise for the last few months. 

We have largely overpaid backups, dumped veterans and not gained much in terms of draft capital, so it's pretty hard to fully understand the direction. It seems to be weighted towards not having almost any players committed to the roster past 2021 and freeing up future cap space. 

I am honestly quite a bit nervous that we will end up making some early Dan Snyder moves in 2022. We'll see what happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PantherBoy95 said:

I guess the positive would be that next off-season they would have the most cap space as they look to shape Rhule's roster right?

Unfortunately not. Kuechlys dead money next year is 7m. If you cut Short (likely) that's 11.5m. Paradis if he continues to be a liability is a 5.4 DM hit. Then there's Gano who had that horrific leg injury. 

 Its one thing having a huge dead money hit in one season as you reshuffle but this is a testament to how badly the cap was managed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsmiaow said:

Unfortunately not. Kuechlys dead money next year is 7m. If you cut Short (likely) that's 11.5m. Paradis if he continues to be a liability is a 5.4 DM hit. Then there's Gano who had that horrific leg injury. 

 Its one thing having a huge dead money hit in one season as you reshuffle but this is a testament to how badly the cap was managed.

Even with that dead money we will still have almost $90 mil in cap space in 2021. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Oh... ouch. I figured it was just glitch. God damn Hurney is dumb.

Not sure if that was mostly Gettleman or mostly Hurney. That signing happened right after Gettleman got fired(July 17th he is fired, July 21st Turner gets an extension). 

Regardless, that contract is really structured about the same way most of them are as far as prorating the signing bonus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Not sure if that was mostly Gettleman or mostly Hurney. That signing happened right after Gettleman got fired(July 17th he is fired, July 21st Turner gets an extension). 

Regardless, that contract is really structured about the same way most of them are as far as prorating the signing bonus. 

  It was restructuring by Hurney. We would have been out for 3M this year if not for that. Same with KK. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PantherBoy95 said:

I guess the positive would be that next off-season they would have the most cap space as they look to shape Rhule's roster right?

Correct.  It would also give us enough cap space to sign our own players to extensions, but instead of using signing bonuses we could give out large roster bonuses.  This gives us even more freedom going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Not sure if that was mostly Gettleman or mostly Hurney. That signing happened right after Gettleman got fired(July 17th he is fired, July 21st Turner gets an extension). 

Regardless, that contract is really structured about the same way most of them are as far as prorating the signing bonus. 

We didn’t have to trade him for a 32 year old who’s only on contract for 1 season at a whopping 22.5 million if you count the dead money from Trai. 13 million cap hit, 9.5 million dead. That’s on Hurney. He didn’t even get a draft pick on the trade.

He must of really wanted out of here or rhule didn’t like him. 

I mean fug our to be starting QB is only a million higher on the cap hit than Okung.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  It was restructuring by Hurney. We would have been out for 3M this year if not for that. Same with KK. 

That's right, I forgot about that restructure. Yeah, that was dumb. But, all the moves from last year indicated "win now" mode. It's just that almost all of them failed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

We didn’t have to trade him for a 32 year old who’s only on contract for 1 season at a whopping 22.5 million if you count the dead money from Trai. 13 million cap hit, 9.5 million dead. That’s on Hurney.

He must of really wanted out of here or rhule didn’t like him. 

I mean fug our to be starting QB is only a million higher on the cap hit than Okung.

We can actually cut Okung and get 100% of the salary back. He has no dead money for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've literally seen him hop around the pocket to survey the field in multiple occurrences. Defenses have this on tape. Cam and QB's like him built the way he was height and strength wise could get by on those natural gifts in their prime. Bryce Young is unequivocally going to have to go above and beyond with his footwork in order to carve out not just a long career but an elite career worthy of a top overall draft selection. We should be able to wholeheartedly agree with one another on that. Intermediate sideline throws without placing the ball out of bounds where the receiver has to contort themselves or make an absurd acrobatic catch for it to be a completion. And yes developing a better chemistry in the deep passing game with his receivers to avoid miscues. Both areas will need to see improvement if the young offense is to develop the way we hope in 2025. And we don't necessarily need to be winning mind you. But development of the supporting cast requires this from Bryce. We have invested a ton of capital in the offensive line. We've invested heavily in WR. We've invested in our backfield. We've invested in TE. We've got a young up and coming offensive minded head coach. The expectation should be for our redzone efficiency to improve significantly. That is not just on Bryce Young. But at the end of the day it will always begin and end with him more often than not. It's always been that way and that's just the nature of the position in this league. And not for nothing but before we drafted Bryce Young nobody was going around here saying we need elite play across the board and top shelf coaching for him to be effective. His biggest selling point was his ability to succeed off script and make something out of nothing. We're certainly going to have to see that come to fruition. Now we wait.
    • I said years ago that RBA was another Rivera. 
    • Honestly, for me, I actually don't care all that much about being the 1st overall pick and him living up to that selection. It's the trade we made to go get him that he has to live up to for me.   You can't be even just an average starting QB after a trade like that, because if that's all we're getting out of it, we could have kept going with journeyman type of QB's or taken a shot on a Jalen Milroe type in the 2nd to get similar play but then have kept Moore and all those other draft picks to build around them.
×
×
  • Create New...