Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers sign former Cardinals NT


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Panthers signed DT Zach Kerr, formerly of the Cardinals, to a two-year contract.

The 29-year-old pickup would normally be viewed as a depth piece, but the losses of Gerald McCoy and Dontari Poe in the open market could force Kerr into an important role early. He totaled 19 tackles in Arizona last year, soaking up 328 defensive snaps across 12 appearances off their bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

If we seriously ignore CB and O-Line for DT, we are a joke. DTs are not as important and are stop gaps. 

See my post above. Before this signing we only had one DT on the roster with real NFL experience and he's over 30 and coming off of a season ending injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

If we seriously ignore CB and O-Line for DT, we are a joke. DTs are not as important and are stop gaps. 

Again you might be disappointed  in Oline plan this year.. But I definitely see them adding at 3 more CB to the roster..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

If we seriously ignore CB and O-Line for DT, we are a joke. DTs are not as important and are stop gaps. 

They will take the old farts who are washed up instead of drafting young tackles.  If they draft a LT with the number 7 pick....They will have to rush me to the hospital....I will drop out with a heart attack

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You might want to re-read that. They're specifically saying they DON'T use stats. They arbitrarily judge each play and then extrapolate that into a grade.
    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
×
×
  • Create New...