Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top College Alumni on Panther Roster


MHS831

Recommended Posts

This list involves the active roster, IR, Practice Squad, and all other inactive lists related to players still being paid by the Panthers.  Colleges with 3 or more players identified as Panthers:

Temple                    6

South Carolina      4

Baylor``                  3

Mississippi           3

Louisville              3

W. Virginia            3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

This list involves the active roster, IR, Practice Squad, and all other inactive lists related to players still being paid by the Panthers.  Colleges with 3 or more players identified as Panthers:

Temple                    6

 

South Carolina      4

 

Baylor``                  3

 

Mississippi           3

 

Louisville              3

 

W. Virginia            3

 

Clearly we want to build a team full of mentally tough guys.  You won't see them pouting and devastated in a corner like Cam because of a loss.  Those dudes definitely know how to deal with an L. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Clearly we want to build a team full of mentally tough guys.  You won't see them pouting and devastated in a corner like Cam because of a loss.  Those dudes definitely know how to deal with an L. 

Yeah, I am not sure I want a team made of guys used to losing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Every college to pro coach struggled with this to an extent. They tend to go with the guys they know. 

True. Gotta remember, the main goal of this season is for Rhule to instill his process and change the atmosphere. Guys familiar with what he expects are the best way to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

True. Gotta remember, the main goal of this season is for Rhule to instill his process and change the atmosphere. Guys familiar with what he expects are the best way to do that.

Yeah, it doesn't usually lead to a lot of success with those specific players but I completely understand the mentality and the safety blanket nature of the move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I am not sure I want a team made of guys used to losing. 

I was really just joking around.  Eye balling that list though is just a weird breakdown though.   I think the tone of every team is set at the top. 

So largely that is all that matters to me.   Coaches and the leadership on the roster set that tone.   But those are unknowns too IMO.  Coaches aside.   Do we have players that won't accept it.  We had those guys in the past.   Not sure I can name one presently.  Doesn't mean we don't have them.  I can't ID a 89.  A Cam.  A Luke. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

It looks fishy but only like 3 actually played under Rhule between Baylor and Temple. I expect this to change in consecutive years as the roster develops. 

I think Rhule was the HC in college for all of them except 1.  He was the OC on that team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I may be wrong but I only counted Anderson, Franklin, and Roy played under Rhule as HC

He was a HC  for everyone at some point except Whitehead I believe.  But he was on the coaching staff for Whitehead's Temple team. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...