Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther defense most conservative in the league.


panthers55

Recommended Posts

This article suggests we play zone specifically cover 3 much of the time and blitz among the fewest times of any team.

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2020/12/02/panthers-coverage-rates-conservative-phil-snow/amp/

There is some conversation that it is personnel but how can we can blitz a lot against detroit and shut them out but with essentially the same guys give up tons of yards and points to the Vikings.  Plus I heard Rhule say if Snow had to replay the game against the Vikings again he would have blitzed more. 

If it was all personnel than when you blitzed you would get poorer results not better ones and you wouldn't change your scheme if you didn't have the personnel to do both.

 

No this just convinces me even more that Snow's preferred scheme doesn't work in the pros and he will need to bring more pressure and put more guys on the line of scrimmage to confuse the blocking protections like we did against Detroit. The 3-3-5 is the old prevent defense which prevents you from winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

This article suggests we play zone specifically cover 3 much of the time and blitz among the fewest times of any team.

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2020/12/02/panthers-coverage-rates-conservative-phil-snow/amp/

There is some conversation that it is personnel but how can we can blitz a lot against detroit and shut them out but with essentially the same guys give up tons of yards and points to the Vikings.  Plus I heard Rhule say if Snow had to replay the game against the Vikings again he would have blitzed more. 

If it was all personnel than when you blitzed you would get poorer results not better ones and you wouldn't change your scheme if you didn't have the personnel to do both.

 

No this just convinces me even more that Snow's preferred scheme doesn't work in the pros and he will need to bring more pressure and put more guys on the line of scrimmage to confuse the blocking protections like we did against Detroit. The 3-3-5 is the old prevent defense which prevents you from winning.

Yeah, there is a reason that "bend but don't break" poo doesn't get used in the NFL......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

It’s almost like we have the youngest  starting defense in a decade 

Again these young guys aren't the problem. Burns, Chinn, Brown etc are the reason we don't suck worse.  And I would be fine if we were aggressive and made mistakes but with a prevent scheme it won't work with any team young or old. It is just a poor scheme against QBs in the NFL who routine pick apart passive zones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

Again these young guys aren't the problem. Burns, Chinn, Brown etc are the reason we don't suck worse.  And I would be fine if we were aggressive and made mistakes but with a prevent scheme it won't work with any team young or old. It is just a poor scheme against QBs in the NFL who routine pick apart passive zones.

If you want a very obvious and clear example of that and only have to watch one game....watch us versus the Vikings. Most of that game we are aggressive and pressure Cousins. Fast forward to the last 6ish minutes of that game and watch us go full prevent to lose the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If you want a very obvious and clear example of that and only have to watch one game....watch us versus the Vikings. Most of that game we are aggressive and pressure Cousins. Fast forward to the last 6ish minutes of that game and watch us go full prevent to lose the game.

Exactly. Makes no sense to hold them to 10 points for 45 minutes using 1 scheme and then give up 18 in the last 15 using a different scheme.  I hope he figures it out soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Exactly. Makes no sense to hold them to 10 points for 45 minutes using 1 scheme and then give up 18 in the last 15 using a different scheme.  I hope he figures it out soon.

As old as he is, this is his first time in the NFL. We haven't been dreadful defensively but we have to gamble more moving forward. Honestly, I don't see what the point of NOT being more aggressive is right now. We are all but mathematically eliminated. Let's get out there and get after it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

As old as he is, this is his first time in the NFL. We haven't been dreadful defensively but we have to gamble more moving forward. Honestly, I don't see what the point of NOT being more aggressive is right now. We are all but mathematically eliminated. Let's get out there and get after it. 

Our line backers suck and our CBs are worse. Teams that Blitz a bunch usually either have great LB Cores or CB Cores. We have neither. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Our line backers suck and our CBs are worse. Teams that Blitz a bunch usually either have great LB Cores or CB Cores. We have neither. 

Sure but what we are doing has been proven not to work. Why not try something different? Otherwise....why did we fire Ron?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...