Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bye week game day thread


LinvilleGorge

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

you don’t need to say anything to me ‘again’

I’ll say to you Perhaps the Saints also propped up a terrible qb when Teddy was the QB. 

they chose not to keep him as the heir apparent knowing Brees was hanging it up  next year.   Think about that.  

Saints also have a way of finding money for players they want to keep. They chose not to keep Bridgewater 

the 63 million would have kept Moton and the WRs and signed a few more 
 

You know what else the Saints chose not to do? They chose not to play Hill when Brees was injured last year when they had both him and Teddy on the roster. Hmmm...kinda weird right? Since they clearly thought Hill was the better QB like you’re suggesting? Almost like there might have been other factors at play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

Eagles Packers just got mildly interesting.

They need to stick with Hurts. It's time for them to find out what they have in him. Wentz is shot and all of a sudden spending a second on a QB doesn't seem like the wasted pick that it seemed to be at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They need to stick with Hurts. It's time for them to find out what they have in him. Wentz is shot and all of a sudden spending a second on a QB doesn't seem like the wasted pick that it seemed to be at the time.

Didn’t look real good there. Might get the ball back but they might not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...