Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The fourth quarter of the Schedule

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Denver:  After a Sunday night battle with Kansas City, the Broncos stay on the road to visit Charlotte.  The Panthers are opening as 4-point favorites. Lock is playing for his future, it seems, and I expect him to look at the secondary and salivate--a chance to get Jerry Jeudy involved.  The Panthers probably get CMC back.  This should be a very close game, but I think Carolina wins at home and moves to 5-8.

@Green Bay: Rogers has been in the Zone this year, and he will be playing to win a first round bye from New Orleans.  With Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago in their division, their record is probably better than the team is.  Rogers in Green Bay in December does not bode well for Southern teams with a QB from the state of Florida.  Carolina will drop to 5-9.

@ Washington: Washington has 4 wins to date, wins vs. Dallas (2), Philly, and Cincinnati.  These 3 opponents are 8-25-2 so far. The Football Team is still in the race for a playoff spot, so who knows how motivated they will be on December 27?  This game can go either way, but I see the Panthers coming out on top and moving to 6-9.

New Orleans:  The Saints play the Eagles, Chiefs, and Vikings before this game; it is reasonable to assume that they will win 2 of these games fairly easily (although Minnesota plays New Orleans tough, historically).  So if New Orleans enters the game at 12-3, and Green Bay (Detroit, Carolina, Tennessee, and Chicago) beats the Lions, Panthers, and loses to Tennessee in Green Bay, then the Packers would be 11-4.  Since Green Bay beat the Saints week 3, they would win a head to head IF they beat the Bears week 17 and New Orleans lost to Carolina.  So New Orleans needs to be 2 games ahead of Green Bay entering Week 17 to have the first-round bye locked up.  That seems somewhat unlikely. The Panthers lose to New Orleans and end the season at 6-10. 

For those of you hoping to see the team tank, Denver and Washington are formidable obstacles--I see the Panthers with CMC and a healthy QB, being favored slightly in both games.  I am not confident that the Panthers will win either, but the odds are that they will win 1 or both.

However, if the Saints are not competing for the first-round bye by entering week 17 a game behind Green Bay (unlikely), they could play scrubs as they have in the past and assist another Panther victory.  In that case, the Panthers could finish as high as 7-9.  Remember, the Panthers played New Orleans tough earlier this season, so stranger things...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

We’re not winning again this year. Which, IIRC, would make the Panthers 1-11 in December games under Tepper. 

lol @ blaming Tepper for our December record. I don't think there is a single owner in the NFL that would have a better record based on what we have been fielding for talent the last two years. It's not Tepper tackling or passing on Sundays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I've never been convinced a team tried to lose a game in the NFL....until yesterday.  That final play of the Jets game.  The Jets intentionally ran a defensive coverage to maximize the Raiders ability to pull off the upset.   No doubt.    No NFL team runs 4 men in man coverage on a hail marry lob w/ no S help.   

I've seen them install players that give them less of a chance.  Never seen coaches call plays to cater to the opponent like that.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I've never been convinced a team tried to lose a game in the NFL....until yesterday.  That final play of the Jets game.  The Jets intentionally ran a defensive coverage to maximize the Raiders ability to pull off the upset.   No doubt.    No NFL team runs 4 men in man coverage on a hail marry lob w/ no S help.   

I've seen them install players that give them less of a chance.  Never seen coaches call plays to cater to the opponent like that.   

 

That is a very interesting point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Denver:  After a Sunday night battle with Kansas City, the Broncos stay on the road to visit Charlotte.  The Panthers are opening as 4-point favorites. Lock is playing for his future, it seems, and I expect him to look at the secondary and salivate--a chance to get Jerry Jeudy involved.  The Panthers probably get CMC back.  This should be a very close game, but I think Carolina wins at home and moves to 5-8.

@Green Bay: Rogers has been in the Zone this year, and he will be playing to win a first round bye from New Orleans.  With Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago in their division, their record is probably better than the team is.  Rogers in Green Bay in December does not bode well for Southern teams with a QB from the state of Florida.  Carolina will drop to 5-9.

@ Washington: Washington has 4 wins to date, wins vs. Dallas (2), Philly, and Cincinnati.  These 3 opponents are 8-25-2 so far. The Football Team is still in the race for a playoff spot, so who knows how motivated they will be on December 27?  This game can go either way, but I see the Panthers coming out on top and moving to 6-9.

New Orleans:  The Saints play the Eagles, Chiefs, and Vikings before this game; it is reasonable to assume that they will win 2 of these games fairly easily (although Minnesota plays New Orleans tough, historically).  So if New Orleans enters the game at 12-3, and Green Bay (Detroit, Carolina, Tennessee, and Chicago) beats the Lions, Panthers, and loses to Tennessee in Green Bay, then the Packers would be 11-4.  Since Green Bay beat the Saints week 3, they would win a head to head IF they beat the Bears week 17 and New Orleans lost to Carolina.  So New Orleans needs to be 2 games ahead of Green Bay entering Week 17 to have the first-round bye locked up.  That seems somewhat unlikely. The Panthers lose to New Orleans and end the season at 6-10. 

For those of you hoping to see the team tank, Denver and Washington are formidable obstacles--I see the Panthers with CMC and a healthy QB, being favored slightly in both games.  I am not confident that the Panthers will win either, but the odds are that they will win 1 or both.

However, if the Saints are not competing for the first-round bye by entering week 17 a game behind Green Bay (unlikely), they could play scrubs as they have in the past and assist another Panther victory.  In that case, the Panthers could finish as high as 7-9.  Remember, the Panthers played New Orleans tough earlier this season, so stranger things...

 

half baked boo GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

    • strato
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By strato · Posted

      Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...