Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones


saX man

The QB Poll: Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones  

197 members have voted

  1. 1. Let's say we have the choice of any of these guys...who's your pick? Give your reasons/team fit/scheme fit/dry your beans

    • Justin Fields, Ohio State, 6'3 228
      71
    • Zach Wilson, BYU, 6'3 210
      62
    • Trey Lance, NDSU, 6'4 226
      46
    • Kyle Trask, Florida, 6'5 240
      10
    • Mac Jones, Bama, 6'3 214
      8


Recommended Posts

Fields over Wilson . . . barely.  I think those two are neck in neck as far as fitting the system that Rhule / Brady want to run.  I'd say there's a gap to Trask who fits.  Lance is too much Cam lite for this system.  I don't know enough about Mac Jones to place him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Fields over Wilson . . . barely.  I think those two are neck in neck as far as fitting the system that Rhule / Brady want to run.  I'd say there's a gap to Trask who fits.  Lance is too much Cam lite for this system.  I don't know enough about Mac Jones to place him yet.

I've been in a tussle over Fields, Wilson, & Lance.  It's just really close and I like all in their own ways.  I've had a feeling about us and Wilson just matching and aligning with what we want come draft time.  So gut feeling he's the one but want Fields the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

You don't over think this one, Fields is a no brainer #2 behind Trevor. Lance/Wilson a toss up then Trask/Jones late 1st and not in the discussion for us

I just don't know though.  I've heard in my limited scouting circle window about Jones being quite lauded.  Could be one of the most interesting QB groups in forever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Are we sure jets drafting a QB? Smart money would be to trade out.

Everyone on this forum thinks they're gonna get Lawrence.

 

Just now, Varking said:

Bro you wrote this right after you showed support for Sam Darnold... that’s some backwards thinking right there. 

At least I've seen Darnold make good throws at an elite competition level. He just has nothing to work with in the Jets. I have not seen that of Fields (who's bailed out by the elite talent around him all the time). I don't love Darnold or think he's a all-pro, but in terms of unlocked potential he's just as good as any of these guys and wouldn't require a first round pic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, qazsazsaz said:

Please put in an option for Sam Darnold. Honestly would rather have him.

image.thumb.png.daa78fba3c9683a338aa98102f3120c1.png

This is your guy?  Yea.  No thanks.  I'm not saying it's all his fault in NY, this is the Jets after all.  Maybe he'll turn into a real QB somewhere else, but I don't want to bet our franchise on a guy who hasn't looked very good against actual NFL competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the last time I watched the Pro Bowl was that year Sean Taylor blew up that poor punter. LOL
    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
×
×
  • Create New...