Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 16 cheat sheet: Who to pull for and why


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Tanker's edition

For those of us who have visions of QBs dancing in our heads, deep down inside we are dreading the expected end of season, “Rivera Run” a process where we dominate the opposition’s bench in route to a win streak that only ends in defeat in late April.  So here is how that is playing out:

Look for New Orleans to clinch the division for our Christmas present, securing a win vs. the Vikings.  This could have week 17 implications, as is the New Year’s tradition in Carolina.  I will examine probable scenarios in a bit.  This is important because we do not want to raise the “We beat the Saints’ Bench” banner this year.

Atlanta (4-10)  will probably get a 40-point halftime lead in this matchup vs the 2019 come back kids, the Chiefs.  KC is 2 games ahead of the Steelers and the Bills, but has defeated the Bills this season, so it is a 2-horse race for the bye.  Pittsburgh has lost 3 in a row, and the nose dive is likely to continue unless they get out of the funk they are in in dramatic fashion.  The Bengals?  Come on man.  They play Indy and Cleveland-two 10-win teams, this week and next.  All that to say this:  KC has a reason to play hard this week—but if they watch score boards, they could empty the bench in the second half.

Carolina (4-10) has actually played well over the past two weeks, losing both games in respectable fashion.  Washington is a far worse team than Green Bay, and Haskins is not the same as Rogers, I heard.   Carolina will not want to face the Washington pass rush, and Washington will keep it on the ground.  Washington has reason to win this game, narrowly holding onto the NFC east lead.  Tankers, this is a winnable game that could come down to who runs it the best and how many interceptions Haskins throws.  However, I see Haskins having a really good game.  Panthers are 2 point dogs on the road, which means this is a coin toss.

Cincinnati (3-10-1) is a half a game ahead of the Panthers in the Tankathon, but they play the pathetic Houston Texans (4-10).  This is a win-win for the Panthers, unless they tie.  If Cincy wins and the Panthers lose, the Panthers move ahead of the Bengals into #3.  If Houston wins, they go to 5-10 with one to play, dropping out of a tie with the Panthers.  Yes, the Panthers have a .020 lead on them in the “strength of schedule” comparison, but the Texans play the 3-10-1 Bengals this week and the Panthers play a team with twice as many wins this week and the Saints next week.  If they both lose or win, Houston could edge the Panthers in that area based on math.   So a Bengals win is preferable—only if we lose out. 

Philadelphia (4-9-1) is a half-game ahead of the Panthers in the Tank standings, and they have a favorable schedule from the Panthers’ perspective.  They are road favorites in Dallas (-1.5) and then end the season against Washington in a game that could determine a playoff berth.  It is the NFC East, so all bets are off—after beating the Saints and playing the Cards fairly close, we need another Eagle win to keep them from stepping in front of us on draft day.

Of course, if the Panthers win, games that feature the Lions, Cowboys, Niners, Chargers, Broncos, and Giants come into play.  So technically, the Panthers range is 3-13—unless they win 2 games.

Back to New Orleans:  The Saints have a 1-game lead for the #2 spot in the NFC over the Rams and Bucs (both 9-5)  and are tied with the Seahawks (10-4).  The Saints trail the Packers by one game for the first round bye, but the Packers won the head-to-head vs. New Orleans, so that is probably a mute point, so the focus here should be on the Rams-Seahawks game.  If Seattle wins, no problem; The Saints would be playing for a #2 seed vs. a #3 seed vs. the Panthers week 17.  If the Rams win, the Seahawks, who end with a 4pm game in San Fran, could still tie the Saints if the Panthers defeat the Saints—but by the then, the tie-breaker would have been determined, and a Saints loss and a Seahawks win week 17 may not have significance.  The Rams, however, would then be 10-5 (vs. New Orleans 11-4) with a 4pm game in Arizona.  Their record vs. the NFC is identical to the Saints, so I am not sure how deep the tie breaker would go.

The best case scenario for this is for the Seahawks to beat the Rams.  That would make the Hawks and Saints both 11-4 going into week 17.  However, the tie breaker seems likely to favor the Saints if the Rams win, but I am not close to being certain about that. 

So essentially, the Saints would be playing for the difference between a #2 and #3 seed if they beat Minnesota.

If they lose to the Vikings and the Bucs win, they would be tied with the Bucs (with a tiebreaker advantage) going into week 17.

So what would we really like to see happen?

 

  • ·        The Packers lose to the Titans (possible—a night game in Green Bay on Dec 27?  The run game may give the Titans and advantage—especially if windy)
  • ·        The Seahawks beat the Rams (possible to probable)
  • ·        The Washington team beats the Panthers (very possible)
  • ·        The Vikings beat the Saints (unlikely)
  • ·        The Bengals beat the Texans (very possible)
  • ·        The Falcons beat the Chiefs (unlikely)

I have examined this quite carefully, but I may have made a miscalculation or forgotten something or someone.  Please pile on if you see something.  Basically, it seems as if the Saints will be playing for the #2 seed vs. the #3 seed in the playoffs week 17-if that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

You’re ignoring strength of schedule.

We want Dallas to beat Philly.

At this point if we win another game it’s such a clusterf*ck anyways. Atlanta isn’t winning another game and that’s for certain. 

I am.  I just have no idea what it will be at the end of the season--it is my blind spot---I admit it.  And Atlanta has KC and TB--a team fighting for its life--they will lose both. So we want Dallas to beat Philly because Dallas would then have 6 wins and would not compete with us if we beat Washington or New Orleans?  However, if Philly loses, we leapfrog them--isnt that 6 of one, half dozen of the other?  Explain what I am missing--head is full.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I am.  I just have no idea what it will be at the end of the season--it is my blind spot---I admit it.  And Atlanta has KC and TB--a team fighting for its life--they will lose both. So we want Dallas to beat Philly because Dallas would then have 6 wins and would not compete with us if we beat Washington or New Orleans?  However, if Philly loses, we leapfrog them--isnt that 6 of one, half dozen of the other?  Explain what I am missing--head is full.

At this point we need to hope that we lose out. I realize you’re rooting for teams in case we do win another game (which I think happens). 

Obviously we’re all in agreement that at this point we need to lose out. So if we lose out and Atlanta loses out (which they will) the tie-breaker is strength of schedule.

Our only uncommon opponents are Dallas/Washington NFC East and Seattle/Arizona NFC West. 

Right now our SOS is lower than Atlanta BUT we play Washington this weekend. So with us needing Washington to win it hurts our SOS. We need Dallas to win as well to offset the Washington win. Same applies with Seattle and AZ. 

Because it is possible that we lose out and Atlanta still picks ahead of us. I’m guessing had Washington beat Seattle on Sunday we’d be listed behind Atlanta in the draft order right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 16 opponents currently have 119 wins and 105 losses. Falcons 16 opponents have 120 wins and 104 losses. So it is extremely tight. 


The only difference in our schedule is we played Arizona and Washington. Falcons played Dallas and Seattle.

To keep our edge we need Arizona and Washington to to have the same or worse record that Dallas and Seattle the two remaining weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Martin said:

Our 16 opponents currently have 119 wins and 105 losses. Falcons 16 opponents have 120 wins and 104 losses. So it is extremely tight. 


The only difference in our schedule is we played Arizona and Washington. Falcons played Dallas and Seattle.

To keep our edge we need Arizona and Washington to to have the same or worse record that Dallas and Seattle the two remaining weeks

Good stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...