Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason Trade: Jonathon Stewart for Jason Campbell


21cents

Recommended Posts

That is the dumbest idea I have ever heard. Jonathan Stewart is as promising a back as there is in the league. We have a situation here like the Chargers did with Michael Turner...why the hell would you trade him for a washed-up, weak-armed QB like Campbell?

Not wanting to be unkind but I agree this is the dumbest idea I have ever heard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe jason campbell has outstayed his welcome in washington. Dont get me wrong hes a good qb when given a oline and running game. Washington needs a change and qb is where it starts. Carolina will be looking for a young qb who can replace delhomme. Campbell will be a perfect fit in carolina with the oline and running game. Stewart is the 2nd string rb in carolina waiting to be a feature back. Washington needs a powerrunner who can take carries off portis. This offseason the Campbell for Stewart trade seems like a match made in heaven. Thoughts?

Campbell?:cuss: Campbell? :cuss:You're talking about Jason Campbell? :banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason Campbell would be a great choice, there's no reason to trade for him though, he's a free agent.

Glad you posted he was a free agent :-) I would not mind at all if he was brought in here to compete for a starting position. I would much rather the team do something like bringing in a free agent than trading Stewart or Smith to get back into Rd 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoooa. Lets not get carried away there. Campbell is much better than our 3rd stringer, but I still think we should pass on him. Rather DRAFT a stud either this offseason or the 2011 offseason.

Much better? He has struggled his entire career w/ making plays to his WRs. Sure, he doesn't turn the ball over but he has never done much with the Washington passing game. Trading Stewart for Campbell would be a waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much better? He has struggled his entire career w/ making plays to his WRs. Sure, he doesn't turn the ball over but he has never done much with the Washington passing game. Trading Stewart for Campbell would be a waste.

I agree, I wouldnt trade for him or even think he's that good. But struggling as a starting QB is still >>>>> holding clipboards and having guys brought in above you on the depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...