Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bieniemy apparently out of the running in Houston


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Guess not. Take the L, man. 
Try the race baiting card another day or just keep it in the Tinder Box.

Literally the only thing you've done here is make excuses for black coaches not getting HC jobs despite players and coaches agreeing they don't get a fair shot. Why do you think you know more than them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Literally the only thing you've done here is make excuses for black coaches not getting HC jobs despite players and coaches agreeing they don't get a fair shot. Why do you think you know more than them?

The only thing you’ve done here is take comments out of context to fit your agenda. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Like I said, it has to be the right type of people. Brainwashing, guilt tripping, and social signaling has a firm grasp on many minds. Sad times in a great era. 

LMFAO!

This is why I hardly ever go to the TB. I have little patience for people who try to skirt around the issue of racism by giving all kinds of reasons why this case and that case can't possibly be the result of systemic racism. 

I'll tell you like I tell anyone else; the data in this country tells a story. That's why I like Andrew Yang who is data-driven. His solutions are data-driven and fully in tune with what's happening in the 21st century as opposed to the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. But, getting back on point, blacks in this country come out on the negative end of the spectrum--the short end of the stick--by just about every social and economic measure that you can think of  (e.g. infant mortality, home ownership, education and higher education, incarceration, loan rates, ability to get loans, communities subject to questionable environmental conditions, covid-19 deaths, wages, etc.) If you want to pretend that this is not the direct result of systemic racism and oppression, that's your choice, but this tells me all that I need to know about you in your regards to a sense of fairness, justice, empathy, and morality.

Now I'm not saying that maybe this isn't currently the issue with the Texans and Bienemy. On its face, you could say that since the Texans appear to be on the way to hiring a black coach, that racism plays no part in this. But looking at the reported issues surrounding the owner and reasons that Deshaun Watson is disgruntled, and the appearance that it seems as though the Texans are trying to make Watson happy and/or at least save face under the pressure of his anger, I'd suggest that there is at least a chance that racism has indirectly played a part in all of this, just like it continues to be pervasive in many social and economic sectors in this country, as reflected by the data. 

Lastly, if you believe that blacks are on the negative end of the spectrum on pretty much all the measurements because blacks actually are inferior, then you're a racist, point blank!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I see you're trying to conduct a thought experiment here but if players and coaches all agree that black coaches aren't getting a fair shot, why you in such a rush to disagree and cape for owners who might only be comfortable with other white folks in leadership positions? This might be unconscious and not outwardly malicious at all, I've admitted that much. But it's weird how you're in such a hurry to justify a qualified black coach being passed over repeatedly while white coaches with less experience and shorter resumes continue to get coaching gigs and more interviews. You don't have to change the subject or bring up the lack of white DBs if you disagree, I promise that's got nothing to do with this

I believe Darin Gantt said that Eric and Tepper had a interview and it when so bad that Tepper asked for another day in the interview. That happened the next day and it didnt go better. That was one deal, but it does seem to be a pattern. Joe Brady rumored issue was he had a weak staff to be hired. Todd Bowles was given a shot, same for Steve Wilkis and I think Vance Joseph got jobs. Soon fired, its the nature of this business. Please re-read about Ron Rivera/2017 being the 6th longest year. Qualified is the question for you and me. I believe you need to focus on McVay. He had great success and Matt Fluer has too, its a tend. 

The issue you need to understand is what it takes to move up the coaching ranks now. Honestly its film work and being able to use technology. Thats where McVay changed the game. Being able to run computer programs and cut up film, while using a Xbox controller.  Both Bill Billacheat and Nick Saben have said this, both were not fans either. That saves time and in a business of long 18-20 hour days, thats a game charger. If I wanted to be a HC, Id hire personal teachers on those subjects. Black coaches need a trendsetter, not fake hand-outs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarHeel said:

The only thing you’ve done here is take comments out of context to fit your agenda. 

It's okay, man. Let it go. It's not his fault.

It's not his fault he has been indoctrinated into thinking every shortcoming ever experienced by anyone of any non-white race has been because "white privilege". It's not his fault he plays the victim card so well. It's not his fault he's a hurt bitch.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cam's New Arm said:

It's okay, man. Let it go. It's not his fault.

It's not his fault he has been indoctrinated into thinking every shortcoming ever experienced by anyone of any non-white race has been because "white privilege". It's not his fault he plays the victim card so well. It's not his fault he's a hurt bitch.

Yep, hit dogs will holler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...