Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bieniemy apparently out of the running in Houston


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

These morons still haven’t figured out the difference between equity and equality but are comfortable calling people racists based on factual information because it hurts their feelings.

What the fug does your statement have to do with anything? Don't hide behind useless verboseness!

In practical terms--in reality--the only way that oppressed peoples will have equity is when society starts giving (showing) them equality!

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

What the fug does your statement have to do with anything? Don't hide behind useless verboseness!

In practical terms--in reality--the only way that oppressed peoples will have equity is when society starts giving (showing) them equality!

Everyone should have equal opportunity to do whatever the hell they want to do. It’s a great thing that in the year 2021 Americans can do just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

Everyone should have equal opportunity to do whatever the hell they want to do. It’s a great thing that in the year 2021 Americans can do just that.

You're right! And if everyone were on a level playing field, that would be fuging wonderful and incredible! But that's not the case! Don't lie and say that it is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Side Note: If the Texans were to choose Leslie Frazier, our old buddy Eric Washington could be in line for a defensive coordinator job again.

I don't know that it'd be a good idea, but hey...

Please let this happen.  The only thing better would be for him the be the dc in dc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

You're right! And if everyone were on a level playing field, that would be fuging wonderful and incredible! But that's not the case! Don't lie and say that it is!

Not everyone starts on an even playing field. That really sucks. But everyone is afforded the same opportunities. Some will have to pay a higher expense or work much harder for it but the opportunities are there nonetheless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

LMFAO!

This is why I hardly ever go to the TB. I have little patience for people who try to skirt around the issue of racism by giving all kinds of reasons why this case and that case can't possibly be the result of systemic racism. 

I'll tell you like I tell anyone else; the data in this country tells a story. That's why I like Andrew Yang who is data-driven. His solutions are data-driven and fully in tune with what's happening in the 21st century as opposed to the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. But, getting back on point, blacks in this country come out on the negative end of the spectrum--the short end of the stick--by just about every social and economic measure that you can think of  (e.g. infant mortality, home ownership, education and higher education, incarceration, loan rates, ability to get loans, communities subject to questionable environmental conditions, covid-19 deaths, wages, etc.) If you want to pretend that this is not the direct result of systemic racism and oppression, that's your choice, but this tells me all that I need to know about you in your regards to a sense of fairness, justice, empathy, and morality.

Now I'm not saying that maybe this isn't currently the issue with the Texans and Bienemy. On its face, you could say that since the Texans appear to be on the way to hiring a black coach, that racism plays no part in this. But looking at the reported issues surrounding the owner and reasons that Deshaun Watson is disgruntled, and the appearance that it seems as though the Texans are trying to make Watson happy and/or at least save face under the pressure of his anger, I'd suggest that there is at least a chance that racism has indirectly played a part in all of this, just like it continues to be pervasive in many social and economic sectors in this country, as reflected by the data. 

Lastly, if you believe that blacks are on the negative end of the spectrum on pretty much all the measurements because blacks actually are inferior, then you're a racist, point blank!

Litterbox, if you want to lose brain cells, its perfect. I can not speak on on current events there, as I never visit (once in years). With trying not to make this thread into one, 100% blacks where given the "short stick" many years ago. I said this even then and for sure now, Id rather be black in America than anywhere else. Its like no one traveled before, dear god I wish some could to get a real dose.  I do not feel Eric has gotten "short-stick"  cause of his skin color, especially with the amount of interviews. Something is happening with the process, that turns owners/GMs cold. Spit ballin- maybe hes blunt and too honest.  Maybe like Joe Brady he has a weak list of hires. One of my  construction guys had a saying about those who complained about hiring process-" You have to be employable".

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone wanted to make the argument that nepotism was the biggest problem black coaches face when it comes to breaking into the HC ranks that's actually more believable than simply black coaches aren't good enough.

As it stands now though the usual suspects want us to believe black coaches are being treated fairly and just aren't built to lead and it's white defensive backs getting discriminated against and well, I guess that's to be expected in a topic like this.

Someone even found a way to complain about "fake handouts" and "indoctrination" while doing it. Heel still can't explain why black players and coaches disagree with his assumptions that head coaching opportunities is a merit based system when clearly it isn't. I can totally see how possibly owners might be more comfortable with white coaches and it's not a malicious thing but a subconscious bias thing, but trying to divorce race from this conversation is just weird. Or maybe it's intentional since it's a pattern for one of you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Not everyone starts on an even playing field. That really sucks. But everyone is afforded the same opportunities. Some will have to pay a higher expense or work much harder for it but the opportunities are there nonetheless. 

I think that's a bald-faced lie, but let's say that it's tue, it sounds like some are privileged and some are not, and sounds like you are happy with that status quo. Typical!

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

If someone wanted to make the argument that nepotism was the biggest problem black coaches face when it comes to breaking into the HC ranks that's actually more believable than simply black coaches aren't good enough.

As it stands now though the usual suspects want us to believe black coaches are being treated fairly and just aren't built to lead and it's white defensive backs getting discriminated against and well, I guess that's to be expected in a topic like this.

Someone even found a way to complain about "fake handouts" and "indoctrination" while doing it. Heel still can't explain why black players and coaches disagree with his assumptions that head coaching opportunities is a merit based system when clearly it isn't. I can totally see how possibly owners might be more comfortable with white coaches and it's not a malicious thing but a subconscious bias thing, but trying to divorce race from this conversation is just weird. Or maybe it's intentional since it's a pattern for one of you. 

How many black HC need to be hired? You never answered my question about who you'd hire. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I think that's a bald-faced lie, but let's say that it's tue, it sounds like some are privileged and some are not, and sounds like you are happy with that status quo. Typical!

My definition aligns with the classic definition of privilege in that it is not bound by the color of your skin. Compared to my mother who grew up in the projects I grew up privileged. Compared to me a lot of my Caucasian friends grew up privileged. Not because they are white but because of the opportunities afforded them based on their head start. But at the end of the day they had to make the decision to not fug up their head start just like my mother had to make the decision to join the military and better herself otherwise fall in line with the family history of poverty and self-loathing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

How many black HC need to be hired? You never answered my question about who you'd hire. 

I didn't answer it bc it really doesn't matter. I don't know, maybe one out of the seven vacancies which all passed over black people? But at this point it'd be ridiculous to force it in Houston bc they already screwed their process bc their owners is a dummy. And it'll always be looked at as a token hire regardless despite the fact that if black coaches were treated fairly and actually given fair opportunity (which is the main point of all this) we wouldn't need the rooney rule and we wouldn't be having this discussion to begin with. Not sure why that's controversial but it offends folks like Warheel who thinks everyone gets the same opportunities and rejects data which proves him wrong lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

My definition aligns with the classic definition of privilege in that it is not bound by the color of your skin. Compared to my mother who grew up in the projects I grew up privileged. Compared to me a lot of my Caucasian friends grew up privileged. Not because they are white but because of the opportunities afforded them based on their head start. But at the end of the day they had to make the decision to not fug up their head start just like my mother had to make the decision to join the military and better herself otherwise fall in line with the family history of poverty and self-loathing. 

Denial of history and denial of social and economic data that indeed does reflect that racial discrimination is still very pervasive in America and that it is still very much causitive and effective of negative results (some having their origins at the birth of this nation) is ignorant and/or morally unacceptable! In other words, it's racist! Point blank!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I didn't answer it bc it really doesn't matter. I don't know, maybe one out of the seven vacancies which all passed over black people? But at this point it'd be ridiculous to force it in Houston bc they already screwed their process bc their owners is a dummy. And it'll always be looked at as a token hire regardless despite the fact that if black coaches were treated fairly and actually given fair opportunity (which is the main point of all this) we wouldn't need the rooney rule and we wouldn't be having this discussion to begin with. Not sure why that's controversial but it offends folks like Warheel who thinks everyone gets the same opportunities and rejects data which proves him wrong lol

Once again, who’s offended?

Any data derived from this discussion has roots that extend decades. I see the point but it’s not enough to generalize entire populations to fit into the tiny narrative that life isn’t fair because of the color of your skin in this country in the year 2021. As other posters have mentioned, travel outside the country and you’ll realize how wonderful we all have it here. Stop drinking the media kool-aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...