Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reimer in net, Ned on the active roster.


Stumpy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Those refs were god awful tonight. Still not sure how Aho didn't draw a penalty skating half the length of the ice with only one arm to end OT.

Overall, we played a tough, gut check type of game tonight. Sloppy at times. A bunch of tired guys not used to playing with eachother. Young guys going up against a physical (read DIRTY) team, they got pushed around at times.

But every time Dallas looked like they were gonna take control we came right back with a counterpunch.

Rod has the team feeling confident even when we are playing our entire taxi squad. I have a good feeling about this team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Those refs were god awful tonight. Still not sure how Aho didn't draw a penalty skating half the length of the ice with only one arm to end OT.

Overall, we played a tough, gut check type of game tonight. Sloppy at times. A bunch of tired guys not used to playing with eachother. Young guys going up against a physical (read DIRTY) team, they got pushed around at times.

But every time Dallas looked like they were gonna take control we came right back with a counterpunch.

Rod has the team feeling confident even when we are playing our entire taxi squad. I have a good feeling about this team!

If Reimer/Marzk can be just consistently average we are a legitimate threat for the cup.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

If Reimer/Marzk can be just consistently average we are a legitimate threat for the cup.

Just gotta hope Mrazek's MRI comes back clean. I do like Ned, but this team is built to make a run this year. I'd hate to see all this talent held back by an inexperienced netminder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Just gotta hope Mrazek's MRI comes back clean. I do like Ned, but this team is built to make a run this year. I'd hate to see all this talent held back by an inexperienced netminder.

Is there any further information about what happened to his hand/wrist/finger?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...