Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Muhammad is talking too


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

“We have to almost throw caution to the wind a little bit; try not to play with as much caution,” Muhammad said. “We’re going to make some mistakes and I think that is part of playing football.

“I would love to be aggressive and I think at certain points of the game we are aggressive and certain points we’re not aggressive. That’s totally on our coaches to decide when to do those things.” ..

Amazingly, through eight games this season Carolina’s wide receiving corps has combined for one touchdown, that coming on a 50-yard scoring strike from Delhomme to Smith against Arizona.

Carolina’s other four touchdown receptions went to tight ends.

“I am totally shocked,” said Muhammad, who returned to practice Wednesday after missing the last two games. “It’s amazing. It’s befuddling to me. I don’t understand it.

Yikes

http://www.carolinagrowl.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=258:muhammad-panthers-need-to-be-more-aggressive-in-the-passing-game&catid=1:articles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's so hard for Moose to understand? The reason why we're extra conservative now is because we can no longer be aggressive due to Jake. Whenever we try to be, he turns it over.

I wish rep was on

I can't believe he dont understand. Is it really hard to understand

Just wow. Seems like this team is getting dumber and dumber like Fox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish rep was on

I can't believe he dont understand. Is it really hard to understand

Just wow. Seems like this team is getting dumber and dumber like Fox

It's like they're so blinded by Jakes personality, they don't recognize his suckiness on the field or refuse to acknowledge it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

moose is exactly right. Arizona didn't bail on Warner when he threw 6 picks against us, they put him in and he threw 5 Tds the next week. Warner has one less Int than Jake but they recognize that they have to throw to win. So do we and Moose knows it.

Funny that in another thread Deon Grant is right on and so smart because he says Jake sucks and now Moose is so stupid in this one because he supports Jake and thinks we need to throw it more and let him play.

I don't think either of them are Einsteins but it is clear we need to pass the ball to win and the only guy who is going to do that this year is Jake. So there really isn't a choice. Play too conservative and we lose, run all the time and we get shut down, or pass it more and maybe we suck maybe we don't.

It isn't that hard to figure out, we need more balance so we have to simply make a gameplan to win and when Jake plays well let him pass. When he doesn't dial it back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's so hard for Moose to understand? The reason why we're extra conservative now is because we can no longer be aggressive due to Jake. Whenever we try to be, he turns it over.

I think Moose fully realizes this, but he's trying to say you can't become as one dimensional as we have the past two weeks. If you play that way you'll lose unless your defense, special teams are near perfect and you play mistake free football.

We are a 3-5 football team playing the way we are and clearly the passing game/lack there of has been a factor in basically all but one of our losses (ATL where Double Trouble was just that for the Panthers with costly TOS) and nearly prevented two of our wins. Mixing it up on offense letting Delhomme attack down the field has resulted in turnovers. Protected Delhomme and only letting him manage the game has made us one dimensional and predictable, hurting our running game and preventing our wide receivers from making plays.

Jake Delhomme should have been benched, you don't "bench" the passing game, you bench the QB who can't pass. Our season will be officially over with 2 or 3 more losses. Feely or Moore probably aren't a long term solution but Delhomme has earned his pink slip from the Panthers. That's not to say he's a bad QB who will never have success in the NFL again, but Kurt Warner earned a few pink slips before coming back. Delhomme and the Panthers need change, and Jerry Richardson isn't willing to spare any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Moose fully realizes this, but he's trying to say you can't become as one dimensional as we have the past two weeks. If you play that way you'll lose unless your defense, special teams are near perfect and you play mistake free football.

We are a 3-5 football team playing the way we are and clearly the passing game/lack there of has been a factor in basically all but one of our losses (ATL where Double Trouble was just that for the Panthers with costly TOS) and nearly prevented two of our wins. Mixing it up on offense letting Delhomme attack down the field has resulted in turnovers. Protected Delhomme and only letting him manage the game has made us one dimensional and predictable, hurting our running game and preventing our wide receivers from making plays.

Jake Delhomme should have been benched, you don't "bench" the passing game, you bench the QB who can't pass. Our season will be officially over with 2 or 3 more losses. Feely or Moore probably aren't a long term solution but Delhomme has earned his pink slip from the Panthers. That's not to say he's a bad QB who will never have success in the NFL again, but Kurt Warner earned a few pink slips before coming back. Delhomme and the Panthers need change, and Jerry Richardson isn't willing to spare any.

what he said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

moose is exactly right. Arizona didn't bail on Warner when he threw 6 picks against us, they put him in and he threw 5 Tds the next week. Warner has one less Int than Jake but they recognize that they have to throw to win. So do we and Moose knows it.

Funny that in another thread Deon Grant is right on and so smart because he says Jake sucks and now Moose is so stupid in this one because he supports Jake and thinks we need to throw it more and let him play.

I don't think either of them are Einsteins but it is clear we need to pass the ball to win and the only guy who is going to do that this year is Jake. So there really isn't a choice. Play too conservative and we lose, run all the time and we get shut down, or pass it more and maybe we suck maybe we don't.

It isn't that hard to figure out, we need more balance so we have to simply make a gameplan to win and when Jake plays well let him pass. When he doesn't dial it back.

IMO- Blame the Fans...

When the stadium erupts in boo's after every incomplete pass and after Jakes INT's, or even when he walks onto the field, you have to make sure you can bring him back home without the crowd going nuts and booing for him for taking the field.

You cant have your team embarrassed like that at home on TV...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“I would love to be aggressive and I think at certain points of the game we are aggressive and certain points we’re not aggressive. That’s totally on our coaches to decide when to do those things.” ..

So, anyone think they'll go back to the time-tested formula of abandoning the run early and letting Jake throw 35 times, or will they continue to tie his arms to his sides and hand the ball off 40 times a game?

Last year he almost always threw somewhere between 20-25 times per game, and that seemed to work pretty well. And this is purely anecdotal (I may look it up if I get the time and energy), but it seems to me that last year our deep balls tended to come late in the game, after he had plenty of time to get into the flow of things.

I think it's easy and convenient to blame Jake, but at the same time it's fairly lazy. Maybe we need to call games a little better to? Just an idea...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's just a talking head.  Talking about gambling. If anybody takes the under on 4.5 wins, they're most likely losing their money.   So he's only saying if you want to bet on a possible sleeper, take the over.  It's not rocket science.  Pathetic that so many on the huddle have reduced themselves to posting purely trash every time they hit the submit button.
    • I mean I think the best case scenario has to hit for the Panthers and everyone else in the NFCS has to hit their worst case scenario.  Personally, I think this is the year that NO finally collapses and I think they finish 4th in the division regardless.  ATL is overrated but still likely a 6-9 win team. TB plays tough football, their defense will be there but their success depends on the offense, they too are a 6-9 win team.  The Panthers are probably 4-6 wins at best. If they find some sort of momentum during the season and get 7-8 wins, and TB and ATL struggle then maybe but I find it very unlikely. 
    • We screwed up a couple years ago taking Bryce in the first place.  Nobody held a gun to our head to jump from #9 to #1.  Most people who keep up with draft news knew this 2024 QB class was loaded and we should have waited, which I advocated. It was a dumb move and I knew it.  Now we have to roll with Bryce another year.  That's fine, because this 2025 class isn't that great.  I like Ewers, but not super high on him.  If Bryce shows improvement, which I think he will, that should get him at least one more season before we have to decide on if he's the permanent answer or not.  I've said before, the 2026 draft is the next window for a franchise QB if Bryce isn't the answer. Bryce gets this year and next at a minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...