Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ned has to play 9 of the remaining 25 games.


zacka77ack
 Share

Recommended Posts

If he doesn’t, he becomes an UFA per his contract. If he does, he can be tendered as an RFA.

Sara Civian has the full explanation in her Athletic article. If you don’t subscribe to the Athletic, you should. It costs the same, per month, as one of those Venti lattes you drink every day.

https://theathletic.com/2470563/2021/03/23/the-hurricanes-may-have-finally-found-their-goalie-in-alex-nedeljkovic-after-waiving-him-in-january/

 

Edited by zacka77ack
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zacka77ack said:

If he doesn’t, he becomes an UFA per his contract. If he does, he can be tendered as an RFA.

Sara Civian has the full explanation in her Athletic article. If you don’t subscribe to the Athletic, you should. It costs the same, per month, as one of those Venti lattes you drink every day.

https://theathletic.com/2470563/2021/03/23/the-hurricanes-may-have-finally-found-their-goalie-in-alex-nedeljkovic-after-waiving-him-in-january/

 

I know that, if he doesn't get those games, he'll be unrestricted. But, if he does qualify as a RFA, that makes him eligible for the land of Starbucks to steal away, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stumpy said:

I know that, if he doesn't get those games, he'll be unrestricted. But, if he does qualify as a RFA, that makes him eligible for the land of Starbucks to steal away, no?

Pretty sure he would be eligible to be taken by Seattle but every team can protect one goalie without sacrificing a forward or defenseman slot.

Right now he is the only goalie under contract beyond this season.

Edited by zacka77ack
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

Pretty sure he would be eligible to be taken by Seattle but every team can protect one goalie without sacrificing a forward or defenseman slot.

Right now he is the only goalie under contract beyond this season.

That sounds right. But, I remember reading somewhere that there was a scenario where Ned doesn't qualify and we get penalised another expansion pick AND Ned is an UFA.

Donald Glover Reaction GIF

Edited by Stumpy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

Pretty sure he would be eligible to be taken by Seattle but every team can protect one goalie without sacrificing a forward or defenseman slot.

Right now he is the only goalie under contract beyond this season.

Well RFA. He’ll still have to be tendered.

On the full subject I bet we give Reimer some “rest” when Mrazek is ready until they playoffs. I bet we run Mrazek Reimer though in the post unless Ned is playing insanely good by then. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

Does he have to start? Play the entire game? Can he come in to replace Reimer and have that count? Part of a game?

 

 

Pretty sure games will only count if he plays at least 30 minutes, so realistically he has to start 9 more games (and not get pulled early in any of those 9).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, t96 said:

Pretty sure games will only count if he plays at least 30 minutes, so realistically he has to start 9 more games (and not get pulled early in any of those 9).

What if we dress Reimer up in Ned's gear and tape some of those fuzzy caterpillars to his face.

Keeps him eligible as a RFA and inflates his stats, driving his price down on an extension. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, thrilled that we're rolling with Ned right now. I believe this'll be his first consecutive starts of his career, hope he dominates again tonight and can take hold of the starting job, or at least be in the mix over Reims when Petr comes back.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...