Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Analytics that will shape Draft Strategy or my name isn't MHS831

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

We have 16 players with first round grades.  Trading with NE (15) guarantees us one of them.  

Trading with WFT (19), we could get lucky and still get one.  If only 2 of the 5 QBs in draft are on list, and 5 get taken there is a decent chance one of our guys could fall to 19.  But because of the risk involved, I'd want a hell of a lot from the WFT in that trade.

And Morgan, I think there will be 3 CBs on OUR board at #8--Surtain, Horn, and Farley. Not sure about Newsome.  So to move back 7 spots you have know the needs and examine the others on the board then--and there are teams that need edge rushers, and I expect a run to go on them around the middle of the draft.  Parsons, a top 3 WR or 2 will be there--I think we can feel good about NE, be prepared to trade back up if we trade with WFT... IS that where you are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

IMO, it all comes down to compensation. I ain't movin back for peanuts. You make me happy, and away we go. 

 

The right haul gives us the opportunity at half a dozen good to great players. I think I can live with that.

Yes--I am sure we have rated these players.  I would give players point values that include need and position value as well as draft spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yes--I am sure we have rated these players.  I would give players point values that include need and position value as well as draft spot.

 

Screw the Draft Chart. I want a haul. I deserve a haul. I want to fleece somebody. If I am giving up the 8th pick, I want somebody to pay big time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Man, that's the rub. What does "plus some" come to? Is an extra 2nd, and 3rd enough? Maybe the further we fall, the more it should cost?

 

I want to be greedy. lol

Me too.  Funny, when I do mocks, I trade and end up selecting 14 stud players and getting a full 2022 draft.  I sent them to Tep.  Let's see if I get offered a job.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Screw the Draft Chart. I want a haul. I deserve a haul. I want to fleece somebody. If I am giving up the 8th pick, I want somebody to pay big time.

Me too.  If I can't have Sewell, I want 3 starters and enough 2022 picks to make Darnold free.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Man, that's the rub. What does "plus some" come to? Is an extra 2nd, and 3rd enough? Maybe the further we fall, the more it should cost?

 

I want to be greedy. lol

https://www.google.com/amp/s/catcrave.com/2021/04/18/carolina-panthers-washington-perfect-trade-partner/amp/
 

This site has it as a 4th... kind of lame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Me too.  Funny, when I do mocks, I trade and end up selecting 14 stud players and getting a full 2022 draft.  I sent them to Tep.  Let's see if I get offered a job.

 

 

It's nice to have a dream. But, trust me. You don't want to put all your eggs in that one basket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted

Man, that was a long-winded post by the OP to say we need a CB.  I already knew that, duh!  Now, I disagree it needs to be in the first as corner is probably the deepest position in the draft besides WR (and were are mostly good there).

We won't take one at #8; only in a trade back.  I'm certain of that.  If we trade back with Sewell already gone I won't be too perplexed.  If we trade back with Sewell still there, I can't say the same.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Morgan Grand Master

Captain Morgan

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And Morgan, I think there will be 3 CBs on OUR board at #8--Surtain, Horn, and Farley. Not sure about Newsome.  So to move back 7 spots you have know the needs and examine the others on the board then--and there are teams that need edge rushers, and I expect a run to go on them around the middle of the draft.  Parsons, a top 3 WR or 2 will be there--I think we can feel good about NE, be prepared to trade back up if we trade with WFT... IS that where you are?

 

after the pc last week, I feel CB is very much on our mind in the first.  I think Surtain and Horn are the targets, and one of the two could be there at 15.  It's a gamble.  

I'd take Newsome in the late first, and would move up to get him if we get enough capital in the trade and get a LT at 15.  

I wouldn't be surprise if Parsons wasn't even on our board but I haven't heard that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...