Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Analytics that will shape Draft Strategy or my name isn't MHS831


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Captain Morgan said:

 

We have 16 players with first round grades.  Trading with NE (15) guarantees us one of them.  

Trading with WFT (19), we could get lucky and still get one.  If only 2 of the 5 QBs in draft are on list, and 5 get taken there is a decent chance one of our guys could fall to 19.  But because of the risk involved, I'd want a hell of a lot from the WFT in that trade.

And Morgan, I think there will be 3 CBs on OUR board at #8--Surtain, Horn, and Farley. Not sure about Newsome.  So to move back 7 spots you have know the needs and examine the others on the board then--and there are teams that need edge rushers, and I expect a run to go on them around the middle of the draft.  Parsons, a top 3 WR or 2 will be there--I think we can feel good about NE, be prepared to trade back up if we trade with WFT... IS that where you are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

IMO, it all comes down to compensation. I ain't movin back for peanuts. You make me happy, and away we go. 

 

The right haul gives us the opportunity at half a dozen good to great players. I think I can live with that.

Yes--I am sure we have rated these players.  I would give players point values that include need and position value as well as draft spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yes--I am sure we have rated these players.  I would give players point values that include need and position value as well as draft spot.

 

Screw the Draft Chart. I want a haul. I deserve a haul. I want to fleece somebody. If I am giving up the 8th pick, I want somebody to pay big time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Man, that's the rub. What does "plus some" come to? Is an extra 2nd, and 3rd enough? Maybe the further we fall, the more it should cost?

 

I want to be greedy. lol

Me too.  Funny, when I do mocks, I trade and end up selecting 14 stud players and getting a full 2022 draft.  I sent them to Tep.  Let's see if I get offered a job.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Screw the Draft Chart. I want a haul. I deserve a haul. I want to fleece somebody. If I am giving up the 8th pick, I want somebody to pay big time.

Me too.  If I can't have Sewell, I want 3 starters and enough 2022 picks to make Darnold free.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Man, that's the rub. What does "plus some" come to? Is an extra 2nd, and 3rd enough? Maybe the further we fall, the more it should cost?

 

I want to be greedy. lol

https://www.google.com/amp/s/catcrave.com/2021/04/18/carolina-panthers-washington-perfect-trade-partner/amp/
 

This site has it as a 4th... kind of lame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Me too.  Funny, when I do mocks, I trade and end up selecting 14 stud players and getting a full 2022 draft.  I sent them to Tep.  Let's see if I get offered a job.

 

 

It's nice to have a dream. But, trust me. You don't want to put all your eggs in that one basket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, that was a long-winded post by the OP to say we need a CB.  I already knew that, duh!  Now, I disagree it needs to be in the first as corner is probably the deepest position in the draft besides WR (and were are mostly good there).

We won't take one at #8; only in a trade back.  I'm certain of that.  If we trade back with Sewell already gone I won't be too perplexed.  If we trade back with Sewell still there, I can't say the same.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And Morgan, I think there will be 3 CBs on OUR board at #8--Surtain, Horn, and Farley. Not sure about Newsome.  So to move back 7 spots you have know the needs and examine the others on the board then--and there are teams that need edge rushers, and I expect a run to go on them around the middle of the draft.  Parsons, a top 3 WR or 2 will be there--I think we can feel good about NE, be prepared to trade back up if we trade with WFT... IS that where you are?

 

after the pc last week, I feel CB is very much on our mind in the first.  I think Surtain and Horn are the targets, and one of the two could be there at 15.  It's a gamble.  

I'd take Newsome in the late first, and would move up to get him if we get enough capital in the trade and get a LT at 15.  

I wouldn't be surprise if Parsons wasn't even on our board but I haven't heard that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The last child @ home has told me he wants to go to a game, so we're seeing vs Rams on the 30th
    • Did we really shut them down though? They had 369 yards of offense.   That is 9 more yards than they average per game and 53 more than we give up per game this year.   If a team gave up 369 yards per game on defense, they'd be the 7th worst defense in the league this year. Yes, I will give our defense credit for having the 4th down stand near our goal line as well as creating the fumble that stopped their first drive, as they did rise to the occasion then, but even the INT was just a ridiculous play/throw and handed it to us and they also missed a FG. We didn't force them into a single punt all game.  We had 1 sack on a QB who had 37 pass attempts. They had drives of 56, 49, 50, 43, 58, and 71 yards (while we only had 2 over 40 yards ourselves). We bent, a lot, but never really broke, partially due to the Packers own mistakes, that's a far cry from "shutting them down" in my opinion.  Again, this is why I'm critical of us after a day like today, I'm able to look beyond a final score and evaluate how we played on the whole, and we keep squeaking out these wins despite not playing well at all.  And yes, that is what great teams do, but they also play well in the majority of their games, where as all we seem to do is squeak out ugly wins without ever playing all that well. I'm not saying I'm unhappy that we won, I've never once said anything like that, but when week after week I see serious concerns with how we played, then I'm going to call out what I see.
    • Washington is going to have to do better than this
×
×
  • Create New...