Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris “Troll” Simms- First round mock


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Seems pretty dead on

His list had Brady (with the best weapons of his career) ranked 15th.  A broken Cam with no weapons top 10.     Simms is basically a huddler looking to get a thread some action selectively putting in some stuff to get it going...

again, Fields at 32 is just trolling.   He puts that in to get people talking before the draft and to come back to him after the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

His list had Brady (with the best weapons of his career) ranked 15th.  A broken Cam with no weapons top 10.     Simms is basically a huddler looking to get a thread some action selectively putting in some stuff to get it going...

again, Fields at 32 is just trolling.   He puts that in to get people talking before the draft and to come back to him after the draft. 

I was referring to Teddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean I kindof respect him for it.  He doesnt just give his hot take and leave.  He actually breaks down why he feels like that. 

He scapegoated last year though or the year before. When he got picks wrong instead of just owning it he claims he let outside interference influence the choices he made. When he’s wrong again will he use that again or own his decisions? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, CRA said:

His list had Brady (with the best weapons of his career) ranked 15th.  A broken Cam with no weapons top 10.     Simms is basically a huddler looking to get a thread some action selectively putting in some stuff to get it going...

again, Fields at 32 is just trolling.   He puts that in to get people talking before the draft and to come back to him after the draft. 

If we trade down and Fields is still there and we still pass on him I’d be very confused about the franchise. There’s no way he drops to 32. This guy, genuinely dislikes Justin Fields for some reason. Maybe he never returned his calls or something. 

Edited by Varking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

He scapegoated last year though or the year before. When he got picks wrong instead of just owning it he claims he let outside interference influence the choices he made. When he’s wrong again will he use that again or own his decisions? 

The idea of a mock draft is it's supposed to be predicated on what teams think about certain players, not what the guy doing the mock thinks.

That, to me, is where Simms fails.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...