Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina not done in the first


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

How on earth are 2 later round picks going to prevent us from acquiring a franchise QB? And what has that have to do with "Mortgaging our future"?

 

We get it. Once again, the Panthers have broken your heart where it comes to QB. But let's not go overboard trying to make it worse than it actually is.

Actually read the post you're replying to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Actually read the post you're replying to.

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. 1 with Hurney. But by all means, hold what happened before he got here against him.

 

The roster as it sits, is better than it has been is a long time. And we still have 6 picks. But hey, Tepper. Right?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. 1 with Hurney. But by all means, hold what happened before he got here against him.

 

The roster as it sits, is better than it has been is a long time. And we still have 6 picks. But hey, Tepper. Right?

 

 

That's the sound of moving goal posts. Guess it wasn't going your way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's the sound of moving goal posts. Guess it wasn't going your way.

 

Nice try. I have yet to change my stance. That your fixation with the QB position has clouded your judgement, and jaded your outlook.

 

By the way. I don't have to move the goalposts. You are a statue with your "We don't have a quality QB, so Tepper and his minions aren't looking good" speil. 

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. If you feel that is an adequate amount of time to start calling it a failed experiment. Then have at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many new coaches that come in to rebuild with no QB.... have done as little as Rhule in regards to a QB.   They generally have made a real investment (an attempt) for the future by year 2.  Rhule now on his second short term vet rental. 

it’s a unique plan to wait to year 3 or 4....to finally bring in QB talent to your rebuild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Nice try. I have yet to change my stance. That your fixation with the QB position has clouded your judgement, and jaded your outlook.

 

By the way. I don't have to move the goalposts. You are a statue with your "We don't have a quality QB, so Tepper and his minions aren't looking good" speil. 

 

Rhule has been here 2 years. If you feel that is an adequate amount of time to start calling it a failed experiment. Then have at it.

Yes, I've been consistent with my position. Do you actually understand why I'm saying we've mortgaged our future on Darnold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes, I've been consistent with my position. Do you actually understand why I'm saying we've mortgaged our future on Darnold?

 

Cuz you ain't happy. And by God you want us all to know about it. You started with Teddy, and continue it with Sam. At least you are consistent.

 

Lot's of folks are not happy we have Sam. But no one but you thinks we "Mortgaged" our future. But hey. Like I said. Have at it.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

 

Cuz you ain't happy. And by God you want us all to know about it. You started with Teddy, and continue it with Sam. At least you are consistent.

 

Lot's of folks are not happy we have Sam. But no one but you thinks we "Mortgaged" our future. But hey. Like I said. Have at it.

 

 

 

 

So, that'd be a "no". Cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not sarcasm. I'm just not going to sit here and teach a class on opportunity cost.

 

Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. lol Because we ignored opportunity costs, we mortgaged our future. And if Rhule doesn't get his sh.. together, we are doomed. Am I right?

 

So tell me, how many years are we doomed to endure before we rise from the ashes of this debacle? Is it even possible to recover from this mess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...