Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PootieNunu said:

Thats what I was saying. I don't think he is a Hof'er but it would be nice if he proved me wrong. 

For sure. It would be great if he ends up being the exception and not the norm. But for this season all he has to do is look good. Next season playoff win.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Call Me James said:

You can hope Darnold turns it around with using outliers like Brees and Young as your goto examples. 

A question was asked for any examples...he answered it.  Read the thread.

9 hours ago, Call Me James said:

Do you overreact with everything? 

Crawl back under your bridge troll.

tenor.gif?itemid=4765403

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Because he didn't play.

You are correct....staved off an 0'fer.

I too hope he can put it together and have no interest in playing an "I told you so" card...

...I'm simply trying to understand the precedent/logic behind the overwhelming cockeyed optimism.

So far the logic seems to hinge on: 

1. Was a #3 pick.  2.  Jets suck.  3.  Sam can "sling it".

As for the precedent, doesn't seem to exist.

Precedent, that a qb sucked for  a few years in the nfl and turned his career around?  There's a bunch.

Your turn.  Show me a qb, top 3 pick,  who started day 1,  with an Oline with the highest pressure rate, with receivers with the dropsies,  with horrific coaching,  no run game, was traded, and then DIDN'T turn his career around.

Surely there's a precedent.  

 

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

Precedent, that a qb sucked for  a few years in the nfl and turned his career around?  There's a bunch.

Your turn.  Show me a qb, top 3 pick,  who started day 1,  with an Oline with the highest pressure rate, with receivers with the dropsies,  with horrific coaching,  no run game, was traded, and then DIDN'T turn his career around.

Surely there's a precedent.  

 

 

David Carr. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

Your turn.  Show me a qb, top 3 pick,  who started day 1,  with an Oline with the highest pressure rate, with receivers with the dropsies,  with horrific coaching,  no run game, was traded, and then DIDN'T turn his career around.

Surely there's a precedent. 

Sure thing...all #3 picks just like Sam.

Blake Bortles (#3 in 2014) -- after JAX went to LA in 2019 and played a handful of snaps (threw 2 passes) in mop-up duty in 3 games.  Out of the league in 2020.  Appears to have signed a 1-year deal with the Packers going into 2021.  24-49 career record as a starter.

Joey Harrington (#3 in 2002) -- played out rookie year in DET, was 21-37 as a starter.  Following 2 seasons started 21 games in MIA and ATL and went 8-13.  26-50 overall as a starter, career was 6-years.

Akili Smith (#3 in 1999) -- 3-14 as a starter in CIN, never made it to another team after rookie deal.

Heath Schuler (#3 in 1994) -- 4-9 as a starter for the Redskins.  Interestingly, after 3-seasons he cast aside and traded to NOR where he went 4-5 as a starter.  Out of the league after 4-seasons.

 

The Opposite:

Matt Ryan (#3 in 2008) -- Matt inherited a team that had gone 4-12 & 7-9 in 2007 & 2006 respectively.  Opened his career with an 11-5 record thereby locking up Offensive Rookie of the Year.  Followed that up with 4 more winning seasons (5 consecutive) and as a starter was 56-22 (reg. season) in that time frame.      

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Sure thing...all #3 picks just like Sam.

Blake Bortles (#3 in 2014) -- after JAX went to LA in 2019 and played a handful of snaps (threw 2 passes) in mop-up duty in 3 games.  Out of the league in 2020.  Appears to have signed a 1-year deal with the Packers going into 2021.  24-49 career record as a starter.

 

Joey Harrington (#3 in 2002) -- played out rookie year in DET, was 21-37 as a starter.  Following 2 seasons started 21 games in MIA and ATL and went 8-13.  26-50 overall as a starter, career was 6-years.

Akili Smith (#3 in 1999) -- 3-14 as a starter in CIN, never made it to another team after rookie deal.

 

 

(#3 in 1994) -- 4-9 as a starter for the Redskins.  Interestingly, after 3-seasons he cast aside and traded to NOR where he went 4-5 as a starter.  Out of the league after 4-seasons.

 

The Opposite:

Matt Ryan (#3 in 2008) -- Matt inherited a team that had gone 4-12 & 7-9 in 2007 & 2006 respectively.  Opened his career with an 11-5 record thereby locking up Offensive Rookie of the Year.  Followed that up with 4 more winning seasons (5 consecutive) and as a starter was 56-22 (reg. season) in that time frame.      

 

I expected more from you, with all of your precision.

Bortles was 5 year with the Jax.

Joey Harrington was 4 years with Det.

Akili Smith was never traded or played anywhere else.

Heath Schuler didn't make it to 3 years and Joe Gibbs was a HOF football coach BTW.

You suck at your own game.

 

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SBBlue said:

I expected more from you, with all of your precision.

Bortles was 5 year with the Jax.

Joey Harrington was 4 years with Det.

Akili Smith was never traded or played anywhere else.

Heath Schuler didn't make it to 3 years and Joe Gibbs was a HOF football coach BTW.

 

All were #3 picks who started year-1 on bad teams "with receivers with the dropsies,  with horrific coaching,  no run game"...

...and all of them...

..."then DIDN'T turn his career around".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SizzleBuzz said:

All were #3 picks who started year-1 on bad teams "with receivers with the dropsies,  with horrific coaching,  no run game"...

...and all of them...

..."then DIDN'T turn his career around".

ah ah ah...you are dropping criteria....it was exactly 3 years.... must be the same...critical piece to get a valid comparison and all....

Try again.

I thought you might get in the ball park, but this is just sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

ah ah ah...you are dropping criteria....it was exactly 3 years.... must be the same...critical piece to get a valid comparison and all....

Try again.

I thought you might get in the ball park, but this is just sad.

 

Despite your consternation, all are legit comps.

Which QB's do you suggest offer a proper comp/precedent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

Despite your consternation, all are legit comps.

 

No, they're not.  Must meet all the criteria, or doesn't count.

Quote

Which QB's do you suggest offer a proper comp/precedent?

No, I'm not going to look them up for you.  Google is a wonderful tool.  Take your time.  We'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...